Poor people are poor because they don’t have enough money

DefeatPoverty.com: Poor people are poor because they don’t have enough money

RECOMMENDED READING

Out of Poverty: What works when traditional approaches fail
by Paul Polak

Out-of-poverty-201x300 Polak, a psychiatrist by training, shifted his full-time efforts to working on poverty over 25 years ago.  He founded International Development Enterprise to focus on helping small, developing country farmers earn more income.  IDE has already helped millions of very small farmers earn their way out of extreme poverty in countries including Bangladesh, Cambodia, Ethiopia, India, Myanmar, Nepal, Vietname, Zambia and Zimbabwe. …

… Here’s the tone of the book quoting from the preface:  “I hate books about poverty that make you feel guilty, as well as dry, academic ones that put you to sleep.  Working to alleviate poverty is a lively, exciting field capable of generating new hope and inspiration, not feelings of gloom and doom.  Learning the truth about poverty generates disruptive innovations capable of enriching the lives of rich people even more than those of poor people.”  Polak believes that we (in the West) are misinformed about why the rural poor stay poor and why most of our efforts don’t help them.

Polak’s Three Great Poverty Eradication Myths:

1. We can donate people out of poverty. …

2. National economic growth will end poverty. …

3. Big business will end poverty. …

…Poverty experts argue that the poor are poor because (a) they don’t have power; (b) they are uneducated; (c) they get sick/disease too often; (d) they need clean water; (e) they need better seeds/fertilizer (or no fertilizer); etc. etc. etc. and the granddaddy of all … they need ALL of these things before they can have any hope of moving out of poverty.  Polak argues that “finding a practical solution requires a different strategy … finding the simplest single ‘lever’ capable of producing the biggest positive result.”  The answer is – increasing income. …

Here are some additional highlights that I gleaned from this book:

  • 800 million people live on developing country small farms.  Vast majority of these $1/day people have one-acre farms with poor soil and no irrigation.  Their main crops are rice, wheat and corn and they usually can’t produce enough to feed themselves.  If they have access crops left over when they sell it in the market, these crops rarely generate more than $200/acre which isn’t sufficient to move them out of poverty.  Hence, they are stuck indefinitely.

  • Get on the ground with the poor.  We spend so little time actually gathering first hand data from the poor.  So many “solutions” are designed from behind desks often 1,000’s of miles away. Get close, observe and ask questions and you will see the simple and obvious things that are needed and can be done in a specific context.

  • Affordability is #1.  The poor must be able to afford to pay fair market price for the tools to enable them to earn more income.  This is the ONLY solution that will scale to help millions and will keep on being available.  The measurable benefits must be realized in months and ROI within a year.  For products designed to serve the poor, “Affordability isn’t everything.  It’s the only thing.”

  • Price subsidies make things worse.  He argues with examples of how subsidizing goods and services almost always ends us making poor people worse off … and this includes food.

  • The green revolution will come later to small farmers.  First they need to get affordable irrigation.  Then they need to have enough savings/income to afford the more expensive inputs.  And then they need to have enough resources to not be financially devastated if there is ten-year flood/drought.  So, it will come, but later.


Comments

9 responses to “Poor people are poor because they don’t have enough money”

  1. Interesting discussion. Are poor people poor because of lack of opportunity, or because they have learned behaviors that perpetuate their poverty.
    Lottery ticket purchase patterns tend to lean toward the poor. They are obviously the least able to afford such an expense, but study after study shows that they are they purchase at a much higher rate.
    Maybe a better way to say it is that they have not learned, or they have rejected the behaviors that lead to accumulation of wealth, and increased wages.
    So, how do you convince a poor person that smoking, alcohol, cable TV, etc… are counter productive, and books, education, and healthy food are long term, albeit less enjoyable pursuits?

  2. Dave,
    Setting aside for the moment the idea that people are poor primarily or only because of their own bad decisions (which I’d certainly take issue with), this article is clearly not about the poor in America. It is not about high school dropouts or single mothers spending money on cigarettes and McDonald’s.
    It is about subsistence farmers on the edge of civilization. Their problems do not stem from too much cable TV.

  3. Travis–thank you.

  4. Early in American history, Indians were seen by most as evil savages. Once the Wild West had been “tamed,” the idea of the “noble savage” emerged. Neither of these was truthful. The same dichotomy seems to emerge when we talk about the poor. Either they are irresponsible people who get what they deserve or they are people of exceptional virtue who would rise to great nobility if not for “the system.” A pox on both houses. 🙂
    What the chronically poor (here or in emerging nations)typically lack is hope, healthy social systems, and exposure to a world where things like deferred gratification actually work. What they usually have plenty of is shame and resignation. Whose to say what destructive patterns we would engage in with the same contexts.
    I reviewed a book a couple of years ago that used the analogy of bee stings. Imagine getting a bee sting and having one dose of ointment that will numb pain for a few hours. That ointment will be valuable to you. Now imagine having six bee stings and only one dose of ointment. The pain that would be relived by treating one sting when five others are still hurting is negligible. So why sacrifice other pleasures to get one or two extra doses? And should you come into a windfall, spend it all on treating those six bee stings, even knowing that the pain will return, because the relief from all the pain for a brief time is preferable to partial reduction in pain over a more extended time. When seen from this lens, deferred gratification and sacrifice of daily vices are not rational. Poor people aren’t irrational.
    There must be hope of a sustained better tomorrow in order for people to invest themselves in significant changes. Therein lies the challenge. How do we persuade people that a better tomorrow is possible? What social systems need to emerge that give plausibility to this hope? Merely throwing money at people’s material needs is not enough.

  5. Travis, I don’t believe that I made any statements about their decisions being bad. Is it your judgement that decisions that lead away from accumulation of wealth are “bad”?
    I agree with Michael. Without hope, those decisions are not irrational.
    To me, with my admittedly western mindset, the decision to stay on land that cannot support your family is one that does not lead to any of the benefits of prosperity. However there are probably a dozen reasons that make sense about why they don’t want to leave.
    So sending seed and other materials doesn’t seem to reduce the problem. People have been going to these areas for decades to try to teach agricultural techniques that could help. I’ve been giving to water drilling projects for years. The situation doesn’t seem to improve.
    I think the question of what to do that might actually have a significant effect is a good one.
    Michael, while I am all in favor of providing bee sting ointment, I would also suggest that it might be a good idea to stop poking a stick into the hive. Continuing to let them keep stinging you without walking away doesn’t seem like a plan.

  6. this is annoying. most of the extremely poor people i know have a ridiculous amount of hope and a resilience that you and i know nothing about. if we want to talk about character flaws, let’s discuss how white america feels completely comfortable to squander our wealth on comfort, entertainment, self-help books and therapists. the really sad part for me is knowing my friends in africa have total faith that we are doing every single thing we can to make the world a better place, completely ignorant of the fact that we judge *them* for the situation they are in. they’d be stunned if they knew the kind of conversations we’re having.

  7. Jen, I’m confused as to what you are responding to. Hundreds of millions of people live in grinding poverty. There are the people I’ve seen the people living off the garbage dumps in Kingston, Jamaica. The are the millions of Aids orphans in Africa. There millions more living in areas with hopelessly corrupt governments that sabotage any efforts at real reform and economic improvement. Survival and perseverance with a positive attitude is not hope. Hope is a steadfast belief that my future can be substantially better than my present and that my children can grow up in a much healthier shalom-filled world. Hundreds of millions around the world do not have that hope. I have friends doing development on every continent around the globe. They give anecdotal evidence to the conclusion of tons of research that all emphasizes this lack of hope for a better future which manifests itself in fatalism in the present.
    I’m utterly mystified how you see anything I wrote as “judging” the poor.

  8. Jen, I apologize. If I had known that I might annoy you, I would not have written anything. Better to not cause the weaker brother or sister to stumble.

  9. WANELOBA FRED Avatar
    WANELOBA FRED

    All this answers are true

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading