The ultimate pathology is suicide. Suicide should be on the increase in a society that is in decline. People whose mental health is at risk should increasingly be pushed over the edge due to the stresses and strains of decaying society. What is happening with suicide in the United States?

The most basic measure of suicide is the crude suicide rate. The rate is the number of suicides per 100,000 people. However, because suicide rates vary considerably by stage of life, an age-adjusted suicide rate is also calculated. This rate is obtained by dividing the population into age segments and calculating the rate per 100,000 people for that segment. Each segment rate is then weighted by its proportion of the total population. The sum of these weighted age-specific rates is the age-adjusted rate. Here is the Age-Adjusted Suicide rate for 1960-2003.

Suicide 

The age-adjusted rate peaked in 1977 at 13.7. It declined significantly over the next three years but steadily increased to 12.8 in 1986. It has declined steadily to a 40-year low of 10.4 in 2000. This is a decline of nearly 25% over the past 25 years.

The overall rate does not tell the whole story. A more nuanced story emerges when five-year age categories examine rates. Look at the years for the highest and lowest suicide rates by age for the period 1960-2002:

Suicide_hi_lo 

Suicide_3_ages

The trend for teenagers has been a steady increase in the suicide rate until about 1987. The rate plateaued until about 1994 and began to decline again. Young adults experienced an increase, but the rate peaked in the late 1970s. It fell some in the early 1980s and plateaued. The rate began dropping again in the mid-1990s. The oldest half of the age range experienced the highest rates in the early 1960s. The rates declined until about 1980, when they began to rise again, although they did not reach previous heights. By 1990 the rates had begun to decline.

Conclusions

  • Age-adjusted suicide rate is near a forty-year low.
  • Suicide rates have improved for adults and worsened for children over the past forty years, although that rate for children has been dropping for the last decade.

This seems to suggest an overall improvement in quality of life.


Comments

3 responses to “Social Indicators: Suicide”

  1. I’d agree with your read of this statistic. It strikes me as peculiar that the age range seems to have a negative correlation. I’m curious how you would interpret this sub-trend?

  2. I think older Americans in the 1960s had high rates of poverty and poor health care. The War on Poverty addressed many of these issues allowing longer lives, lives with more dignity, and adequate health care.
    However, as we turned our attention toward older adults we turned it away from children and all the infrastructure that serves children. I think that led to more and more dysfunction. By the mid-1980s the public and private attention began to turn toward children again.
    William Stauss and Neil Howe point out that if you watch movies and TV from 1950s and early 1960s the children are portrayed as sweet cherubic creatures (The Beaver.) By the early 1970s (also the advent of Roe v. Wade) children become Rosemary’s baby. This children “as evil or at least an annoyance” attitude continues right into the 1980s like the fowl mouthed bratty kids in E.T. But in the mid-1980s you begin to see “Baby on Board” signs in cars and ever since parents have been becoming more protective. (I should also note that the kids that were born during this child hostile time are the much maligned Gen X.)
    I don’t think this explains it all, but I think these were important factors.

  3. Good point.
    You’re obviously right about the l’enfant terrible phenomenon. Perhaps it does reflect different cultural priorities that translate into quality of life issues for the respective populations?

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading