I wrote recently about the Fourth Turning as an age of crisis. According to William Strauss and Neil Howe, we have just entered that period. Lately, Americans have been almost consumed with national events, terrorism, and events in Iraq. A few days ago, I posted an article about growing unrest about change coming too slowly in China. I read in the paper today that it appears that Bolivia has elected a socialist president who has vowed not to cooperate with the US on stopping coca production. Then I read this article, Putin fears hue and cry of Orange Revolution, which gives a good summary of events happening in Russia.
Moscow no longer is capital of the other global superpower. Its power has declined, its reach receded, its influence waned. Nonetheless it is a country of 145 million people with a vast Eurasian landmass, great reserves of oil and gas, a decaying but nonetheless threatening nuclear arsenal, and continuing aspirations to be a major global force. We ignore the retreat of freedom in Russia at our own peril.
Add France's difficulties with a pluralist society, and it seems we have a volatile mix at work worldwide. There have always been volatile events in the world, but what Strauss and Howe maintain is key is the way a particular generational configuration (i.e., turning) is likely to respond to events. Our present American configuration historically tends to push things to a crisis.
Leave a Reply