Roots of human family tree are shallow

As an avid family history buff, I found Roots of human family tree are shallow to be an interesting article.

That means everybody on Earth descends from somebody who was around as recently as the reign of Tutankhamen, maybe even during the Golden Age of ancient Greece. There's even a chance that our last shared ancestor lived at the time of Christ.

"It's a mathematical certainty that that person existed," said Steve Olson, whose 2002 book "Mapping Human History" traces the history of the species since its origins in Africa more than 100,000 years ago.

The article doesn't say this common ancestor was the only person living then. Just that everyone living today can trace at least one line of their ancestry back to this one individual.

Every person has two parents, four grandparents and eight great-grandparents. Keep doubling back through the generations — 16, 32, 64, 128 — and within a few hundred years you have thousands of ancestors.

It's nothing more than exponential growth combined with the facts of life. By the 15th century you've got a million ancestors. By the 13th you've got a billion. Sometime around the 9th century — just 40 generations ago — the number tops a trillion.

But wait. How could anybody — much less everybody — alive today have had a trillion ancestors living during the 9th century?

The answer is, they didn't. Imagine there was a man living 1,200 years ago whose daughter was your mother's 36th great-grandmother, and whose son was your father's 36th great-grandfather. That would put him on two branches on your family tree, one on your mother's side and one on your father's.

In fact, most of the people who lived 1,200 years ago appear not twice, but thousands of times on our family trees, because there were only 200 million people on Earth back then. Simple division — a trillion divided by 200 million — shows that on average each person back then would appear 5,000 times on the family tree of every single individual living today.

Our family can trace four lines back to four of five children born to George Morton (1585-1624) and Juliana Carpenter Morton (1584-1665) of Plymouth, MA. That is only 12-14 generations back. I also know that Melissa and I are 9th cousins once removed. I had never really stopped to think about this mathematics in quite this way, but it makes sense.


Comments

4 responses to “Roots of human family tree are shallow”

  1. Dana Ames Avatar
    Dana Ames

    I saved an article from a Sunday SF Chronicle supplement, a reprint from US News & World Report in 1991. It’s called “The Mother Tongue”. This is where my interests lie- God built my brain for sound: I’m a musician, I have a degree in German and can converse (haltingly) in Italian and Spanish, and I work as a medical transcriptionist. The article talks about how groups of linguists, working independently of one another, have reconstructed a Proto-Indo-European language believed to have arisen about 8000 years ago in Anatolia.
    One of them “suggests that it is farmers, not warriors, who were responsible for the spread of Indo-European language into Europe. He notes that even if a farmer’s offspring had moved only 10 miles away to set up farms of their own, the resulting wave of agriculture could have swept throughout Europe from Anatolia in about 1500 years, carrying the Indo-European language with it.”
    But they’re going even further- here’s the tie-in to the “common ancestor”:
    “Stanford geneticist Luigi Cavalli-Sforza says…’When the human expansion around the earth took place some 50,000 years ago, it caused a number of separations between groups that didn’t communicate again, genetically or linguistically. As the genes became different, the languages became different too….Cavilli-Sforza found that the groupings of the human family based on genetic evidence closely mirrored the language groupings laid out independently by historical linguists. The oldest split occurred between Africans and other world populations, reflecting the migration of Homo sapiens out of Africa…[Geneticists from UC Berkeley] traced genetic material from women around the world and concluded that all humans alive today are descendants of a tiny population of Homo sapiens that lived in Africa. If the human race did arise from this small group of people, it is likely they all spoke the same language, contends Vitaly Sheveroskin. What’s more, he says, the same techniques that gave rise to the reconstructions of ancient [linguistic] macrofamiles can also be used to dredge up bits of the original mother tongue of the human race…He and and other liguists have reconstructed dozens of words in this original mother tongue…[including] a category of words that referred to pairs of objects, reflecting, perhaps, a culture that before the invention of mathematics counted the world in ones, twos and many…”
    Here’s something else from the sidebar: “Because the earliest alphabets lacked vowels, they still posed a problem for the average reader, who found words made only of consonants difficult to decipher…The Greeks introduced vowels in 740 BC, clarifying written text and allowing anyone to record debates, speeches, personal thoughts and ideas. The alphabet transformed writing into a tool that gave individuals of any social class the opportunity to express themselves, and most scholars conclude that its invention was inseparable from the first inklings of democracy and the birth of poetry.”
    And blogging?…
    Happy 4th-
    Dana

  2. Dana thanks for sharing all this. Fascinating stuff! I googled the article you mentioned and found it at The Mother Tongue More recent studies of human dna are suggesting human beings have been around less than 60,000 years. I hadn’t ever read about this analysis of language.
    As to the connection of adding vowels and democracy, isn’t interesting the nearly every major leap in human develpment is connected with some advancement in communication. Of course, the blogging thing could just be one of the those negative unintended consequences. *grin.*
    It has always struck me that people who seem adept at speaking multiple languages also are often good musicians. My brother is fluent in Spanish but can also speak German and get along in a few other European languages. He also plays guitar, bass, piano and I think a few other intsturments. My dad was a research chemist and being around sceintists I was alwasys struck by how many of them also gravitate toward music. (Something about the mathematics of it I think.)
    Me? I struggle with one language (as evidenced in this blog) but I can play a really mean ipod.

  3. Dana Ames Avatar
    Dana Ames

    Glad you found it fascinating rather than just taking up space in your comments 🙂
    You play English just fine.
    A good percentage of our local symphony consists of doctors, and I know quite a few more who play instruments (some publicly and some not).
    Dana

  4. I’m always amazed at how science eventually catches up with Scripture. For the apostle declares, God “made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth…” (Acts 17:26).
    The answers really are in Genesis.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading