Misbegotten Sons

From the Economist: Misbegotten Sons about Richard Dawkins new book "The God of Delusion."

“THE GOD DELUSION” is an irreverent book. The author, Richard Dawkins, accuses Jesus of having “dodgy family values”. And don't get him started on the God of the Old Testament, “a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sado-masochistic, capriciously malevolent bully”.

Mr Dawkins is an atheist, an evolutionary biologist and an eloquent communicator about science, three passions that have allowed him to construct a particularly comprehensive case against religion. Everyone should read it. Atheists will love Mr Dawkins's incisive logic and rapier wit and theists will find few better tests of the robustness of their faith. Even agnostics, who claim to have no opinion on God, may be persuaded that their position is an untenable waffle.

…..

It is easy to denounce such deluded zealots [9/11 hijackers], but what relation do they have to ordinary, “sensible” religious people? The problem, as Mr Dawkins sees it, is that religious moderates make the world safe for fundamentalists, by promoting faith as a virtue and by enforcing an overly pious respect for religion. (Why is it easier for a Quaker to avoid combat duty as a conscientious objector than someone who simply deplores violence?) Furthermore, the argument goes, any positive aspects of religion can be replaced by equally beneficial non-religious substitutes.


Comments

4 responses to “Misbegotten Sons”

  1. Bitacle Blog Search Archive – Misbegotten Sons

    […] From the Economist: Misbegotten Sons about Richard Dawkins new book “The God of Delusion. […]

  2. Bitacle Blog Search Archive – Misbegotten Sons

    […] From the Economist: Misbegotten Sons about Richard Dawkins new book “The God of Delusion. […]

  3. Hi Mike,
    Dawkins is no doubt a gifted, intelligent man, but he works my last nerve. As a theistic evolutionist, I actually think he hurts the cause of science and the fact of evolution by taking on religion and religious people such as myself, rather than simply showing that religion and science can mix.
    And I just don’t understand why he has to be such an evangelist for atheism. I am cool with him being an atheist, but why can’t he simply work with religious moderates and liberals over against religious extremists. Further, I think that it is patently false that religious moderates provide cover for the extremists. Extremists would be in place whether moderates were or not. In fact, the problem with Islam is not that they have moderates, but that the moderates are intimidated by the extremists and don’t have as strong of a voice. This flipped with Christianity, where moderates are able to keep the extremists in check.
    Finally, my hunch is that many atheists are embarrassed by Dawkins, he comes across like the Jerry Falwell of atheism. Both of thos guys get on my nerves. And sorry for the long post.

  4. “…but he works my last nerve.” LOL
    “As a theistic evolutionist…”
    My position as well.
    “Finally, my hunch is that many atheists are embarrassed by Dawkins, he comes across like the Jerry Falwell of atheism. Both of thos guys get on my nerves.”
    Interesting parallel and I think you are right. When issues of faith and science come up I can’t count the number of times I have seen scientists eyes roll at the mention of Dawkins name.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading