Never too late to scramble

From the EconomistNever too late to scramble

China is rapidly buying up Africa's oil, metals and farm produce. That fuels China's surging economic growth, but how good is it for Africa?

…..

The summit in Beijing is being greeted by Chinese officials and the country's state-run media with an effusion reminiscent of the cold-war era, when China cosied up to African countries as a way of demonstrating solidarity against (Western) colonialism and of outdoing its ideological rival, the Soviet Union. It supported African liberation movements in the 1950s and 1960s, and later built railways for the newly independent countries, educated their students and sent them doctors.

China's main aim then was to gain influence. Now China wants commodities more than influence. Its economy has grown by an average of 9% a year over the past ten years, and foreign trade has increased fivefold. It needs stuff of all sorts—minerals, farm products, timber and oil, oil, oil. China alone was responsible for 40% of the global increase in oil demand between 2000 and 2004.

…..

The love affair with China, however, may be sour as well as sweet. For countries that do not sit on oil or mineral deposits, higher commodity prices make life harder. Even for producers there are risks. A recent report by the World Bank argues that Africa's new trade with China and India opens the way for it to become a processor of commodities and a competitive supplier of cheap goods and services to Chinese and Indian consumers. But another report, from the OECD, a club of industrialised countries, argues that China's appetite for commodities may stifle producers' efforts to diversify their economies. Oil rigs and mines create few jobs, it points out, and tend to suck in resources from other industries. And if Africa is to escape its vulnerability to the capricious movements of world commodity prices, it must start to export more manufactures. On this the World Bank adds its own warning: China and India must end their escalating tariffs on Africa's main exports.

…..

Some say China's involvement will erode efforts to promote openness and reduce corruption, especially in oil and mining. Nigeria insists that Chinese companies must respect its new anti-graft measures, and the latest bidding round for oil blocks in Angola has been the most open so far. In both countries it is unclear whether China's presence is making corruption better or worse. It is clear, though, that China is not interested in pressing African governments to hold elections or be more democratic in other ways. That helps to explain why China directs so much money towards Sudan, whose odious regime can count on China's support when resisting any UN military intervention in Darfur. China invested almost $150m in Sudan in 2004, three times as much as in any other single country. When American and Canadian oil companies packed their bags there, China quickly stepped in, drilling wells and building pipelines and roads. The Chinese are supposed to be building an armaments factory as well.

…..

That is a warning to Africans that this new interloper in their continent is no more altruistic than its predecessors. Still, that does not mean China's involvement is bad and it is certainly not to be stopped. It is up to Africans to ensure that they get a fair deal from it. If so, both China and its African partners can be winners.


Comments

2 responses to “Never too late to scramble”

  1. From my perspective, China is basically setting itself up as a different version of the same colonial past that African nations have experienced, tyrannized by their governments self interest backed by the power of an international power, like China. Here in Uganda, China is looking to see if the huge amount of swamp/marshland can be effectively used for rice production. This already takes place on a small scale. If the practice of exporting follows the trend it did with vanilla, then Ugandans will ultimately suffer, and the “big men” will prosper, along with more firmly entenching China as the next Super power (if it is not already).

  2. Thanks for you perspective, Ryan. It seems from my limited perspective, that China’s dealings with African governments that have not effectively established rule of law and property rights is troubling.
    I heard the former prime minister of Estonia speak earlier this year. He suggested that as big a problem as terrorism is, he thought China is the big problem. He said a really bad scenario is for China to experience economic growth to the point it threatens power elites and then there is a reversal. It will damage the world economy. However, he said even worse would be if China manages to keep totalitarian rule in place with these limited freedoms and succeeds economically. Every totalitarian power that reaches a certain level of economic advancement next turns it eyes to expansion.
    Do you see any particular policy solutions that would help thwart new colonialsim?

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading