The Other Six Days: C1 – Beyond Unapplied Theology

The Other Six Days

Part One – A People Without 'Laity and Clergy': Chapter 1 – Doing People Theology

Beyond Unapplied Theology

“To most ordinary people formal academic theology seems abstracted from life, a matter lamented by Lesslie Newbigin who notes how the work of scholars makes it appear to the ordinary Christian that no one untrained in their methods can really understand anything the Bible says. ‘We are,’ he says, ‘in a situation analogous to the one about which the great Reformers complained…’ What would recovering a theology for the whole people of God mean?” (10)

This is the question Stevens explores in this second section of Chapter 1. He offers three major observations.

First, Stevens points out that we have come to perceive theology as a "delivery mechanism." We persuade people of the truth and then of their need to act on it. You learn the theory, bank up some knowledge, and then go out and apply it.

Stevens argues for joining doctrine and ethical practice. "The only theology that is truly Christian is one that has been applied…" and you can't truly do theology without engaging yourself in the love of God and neighbor. Stevens points out that the Hebrew word for 'know" and for 'intercourse' are the same word, and it is only at this relationally intimate level that we can truly do theology.

Second, Stevens observes that the split between theory and practice has been a relatively recent development. He summarizes a concern of Ellen Charry by saying, "She calls for a recovery of 'sapience' – engaging God in love so that knower and known are connected emotionally, something largely lost in modernity when theology became the intellectual justification of the faith." (11) Stevens says that theology in the primitive Church, up until the twelfth century, "…related to practical issues and questions arising from the liturgy and life of the people of God. It was a practical habitus – the disposition of the soul, lived truth, phronesis – practical wisdom. It did not separate theory and practice."

Beginning with Aquinas, theology became increasingly speculative and dominated by rational formulae. Theology began to fracture into systematic theology, applied theology, ethics, missiology, and other sub-topics. It largely took theology out of the hands of the people. One impetus of the Reformation was to restore theology to the people. (Stevens quotes Luther "True theology is practical … speculative theology belongs to the devil in hell." (14)) However, Stevens says the divide between moral theology and pastoral theology was made by the eighteenth century, and by the nineteenth century, "…clerical captivity of applied theology was almost complete."

Third, Stevens points to signs that we are recovering the idea of theology as phronesis – practical wisdom. He points to the emergence of the liberation theologians and their attempts to "live" their way into a new theology instead of "thinking" their way into a new theology. Without necessarily endorsing all that these theologians stood for, this aspect of their communities is evidence of people beginning to reorient theology in this way. Stevens asks:

If all the disciplines of the theological academy were consistently taught in the direction to which the Bible points – faith active in love – with theory and practice interdependently linked, rather than merely placed in a linear way, would there be any need for a separate discipline called applied theology? (15)

In short, Stevens says that a theology that is for the People of God "…explains and empowers the life of the ordinary believer in the world. …it sees acts of faith as not only applying but discovering doctrine." (15-16)

It strikes me that these issues are at the very heart of the Emerging Church conversation. When I look at the state of most congregations and Christians in our culture, no matter what the stripe, I think it is this disconnect between "theory and practice" or "knowing and doing" that has delivered theology into the hands of a caste of "degreed" Christians and devastated the effective witness of the Church in our world.

What do you think?

[Previous] [Next]


Comments

4 responses to “The Other Six Days: C1 – Beyond Unapplied Theology”

  1. Thanks for the very interesting post. I agree with the premise that the theology only matters when it’s applied. However, what makes me uncomfortable with some of the emergent movement is the dismissal of theological doctrine. In search of orthopraxy, we ought not abandon orthodoxy.
    My point is theology matters! You will end up applying what you truly believe whether you’re aware of it or not…so we need to get it right.
    thanks Michael for the post.

  2. I share your apprehension, Andre. Every movement is to some degree “messy” and there are excesses. If the aim is to replace doctrine with community then we have a problem.
    I would suggest that the thrust of many emerging churches is to recover the interconnectedness of doctrine and community. The Bible is not for the most part a book of doctrine. It is testimony (testament) about a story God is unfolding in history and God’s intention for the world. There is no doctrine without community (it was a community the decided what books were inspired or not) but there is no community without doctrine.
    I don’t know if the makes much sense but that is how I would frame it.

  3. Dana Ames Avatar
    Dana Ames

    Another case of both/and 😉
    Good point about theology and church history. As I’ve only dipped a bit into the church fathers, it seems that at least a major point of the councils was for the bishop/theologians to actually take decisions back to congregations so that all the people would be able to live a right life and render right praise (ortho-doxy) with increased understanding. Hammering out “doctrine” wasn’t meant to be for the rarified theologs only. It seems that is still the intention in the East, though I don’t know if/how it’s carried out. In the West, it seems to me that so much was invested in the ecclesiastical structure, along with specialization of the academy removed from the people; this was certainly one of the things that engendered the Reformation- which the Eastern churches didn’t have.
    Dana

  4. Orthodox, RC, Protestant or whatever. I think we all have our issues.
    I think it was Greg Ogden who wrote that we only completed half the Reformation. We removed the priest as mediator from our soteriology (how we experience salvation) but we left him in our ecclisiology (how we organize ourselves for mission.) What we may be experiencing is “The Reformation: Part II.”

Leave a Reply to Dana AmesCancel reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading