The Other Six Days: C1 – Beyond Academic Theology

The Other Six Days

Part One – A People Without 'Laity and Clergy': Chapter 1 – Doing People Theology

Beyond Academic Theology

The first two sections of this chapter have called for us to move beyond clericalized theology and unapplied theology. In this last section of chapter 1, Stevens focuses on theology's captivity to academia. One of my favorite lines from the book is, "The theological task is not only to exegete Scripture but to exegete life, and to do these together." (17) Stevens quotes Alister McGrath, who rather boldly states:

Theology must come down to earth, to serve the church and its mission to the world – and if it will not come down to earth, it must be brought down to earth by so marginalizing academic theology within the life of the church that it ceases to have any relevance to that church, in order that a theology oriented toward the pastoral and missiological needs of the church may develop in its wake. (17)

Many of the early church fathers were non-clerical, non-professional theologians. Steven's lists Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Socrates, and Sozomen as examples. Reformation icon John Calvin was not a professional theologian, as was true of other reformers. The Eastern Church has had a far less clericalized history, with important theological chairs being held by laymen over the years.

The reality is that as we all move through our lives, we are repeatedly pressed to reflect upon questions about identity and what story we find ourselves living in. People do theology every day of their lives, but there is a significant chasm between the theology done in daily life and theology done in the academy.

Karl Barth claimed that "irregular dogmatics" (dogmatics done in response to a critical issue) has been the norm throughout history. Stevens points to Athanasius and Luther as examples, in contrast to Melanthon and Calvin, who did "regular dogmatics." In fact, Barth says that the impetus for the complete theology of regular dogmatics always originates in the issues raised by irregular dogmatics.

Stevens advocates that the whole people of God must do theology as they live out their lives in the congregation, the home, and the marketplace. The primary arena is daily life, not "in-house service." Stevens carefully points out that he sees a critical role for the professional theologian. There can be a tendency for communities to elevate certain aspects of God's work in the world to the exclusion of other aspects. Professional theologians are needed to keep us in touch with the whole story and keep us in dialog with other theological voices, present and past. Stevens' primary concern is this:

In contrast to the dichotomizing of theology and practice in the theological academy today, the New Testament presupposes a community in which every person is a theologian of application, trying to make sense out of his or her life in order to live for the praise of God's glory: Theology of, for and by the whole people of God. (21)

I wonder how Stevens' thoughts here might impact how seminaries work. I wonder how it might affect how theological reflection and education are done in the life of our congregations.

[Previous] [Next]

 

 

 

 


Comments

11 responses to “The Other Six Days: C1 – Beyond Academic Theology”

  1. I couldn’t agree more. The questions need to be deeply pondered, theology should be participatory and applied, so that’s not the question. The real questions are why isn’t it and how to make it so.
    Sending all and sundry to seminary is hardly the answer! Whether seminary as a concept is biblical certainly has to be asked and we may no be comfortable with the answer.
    Finally, comes the reality of the institutional character of ‘church’ and without licking that one the others may not become amanable…

  2. “Finally, comes the reality of the institutional character of ‘church’ and without licking that one the others may not become amanable…”
    I think any effective movement will eventually create structures to further mission. Whether or not the structures we have today are the right ones is highly debatable in my estimation. Structure should flow out of mission.
    I try not to focus too much on fighting structures but rather on clarify vision. The right structures and istitutions will flow out of realigned vision. Unfortunately, bad existing structures tend to hamper apprehension of new vision so some conflict is unavoidable.

  3. Hmmm, a distinction needs to be made between structure (could be helpful or not) and institution in the sense of an organization with a constitution, membership and a desire to propagate itself – which i think is unbiblical primarily because we end up trying to serve two masters.

  4. Form follows function, in other words. Right?
    In the oldline, where paradigms have been set and ossified- how does one clarify vision, caste vision- for folks who are in their later yrs, and just want things back in the old paradigm?
    Is it a matter of- to take a riff from your previous blog posting on the big problems by the Danish economist at TED – prioritizing solutions, instead of problems? And for leaders in the congregation to be ruthless in implimenting that prioritizaiton?

  5. Sam, I am using “insitution” in its generic sense as in Websters: “an organization, estalbishment, foundation, or society, or the like devoted to the promotion of a particular cause or program.” For a movement to continue it will develop institutions.
    This one area where I sense the Emerging Church is being deeply Protestant: We are protesting constitutions and membership which IMO is a very secondary concern. It is not about what we are opposing, it is about what we are for.
    During the Reformation the Protestants threw all the icons and art out of the churches because of the idolatry connected with. The issues was not art and but art inappropriately used for true mission of the church. I think the Emerging Church seen errs some with its anti-institutonal “protest” instead of using a vision oriented compass.
    The best criticism of the bad is the practice of the better.

  6. Dave, personally I think it is a matter of triage. Some churches are reasonably healthy. Some need a little assistance. Some need a lot of assistance. Some need a chaplain and hospice care. Oh for the wisdom to sort out which is which.
    I know it is a bit cliche but I come back to the quote by Antoine de Saint-Exupery
    “If you want to build a ship, don’t drum up the men to gather wood, divide the work and give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea.”
    People act on vision and seem see the vision before others. I think it begins with one-by-one discipleship that encourages discipleship of others until a critical mass evolves the sweeps change into existence. It is painful difficult long-term investment that takes years not months. I know of few churches that have radically changed successfully that didn’t have these elements. Do you have some thoughts on this?

  7. Michael,
    Well, the EC may be anti institutional in its own ways. I personally came to the conclusion that institutions divide my loyalty and are essentially inimical to the gospel quite a bit before even hearing of such a phenomenon as ’emerging’.
    “For a movement to continue it will develop institutions” again I demur. Seems that when institutions are established, it’s the institutions that continue, regardless of the movement for which they were started.

  8. “Seems that when institutions are established, it’s the institutions that continue, regardless of the movement for which they were started.”
    And I think that is the great dilemma. We can’t live with them and we can’t live without them. I don’t intend to minimize the perils that institutions bring. I just believe they are inescapable.

  9. One good thing about the EC (in all its manifestations) is that various types of structures and formulas are being tried out. This in some sense seems to parallel what the NT environment looks like and if it continues to be fluid and refuses to ossify into one or a few select models, yet maintaining the essential commitment to obedience to the gospel, I think we may find that variety and a formula less (tho not formless) approach can be very freeing up as far as allowing the Holy Spirit to develop maturity and discipleship without the necessity for institutionalisation.
    However, that’s at present only a rather dim hope, for history shows us that whatever revivals have taken place, as time goes on our tendency is to put our faith in a formula if for no other reason than that we feel vaguely uncomfortable when no one seems to be totally in charge.

  10. “…we feel vaguely uncomfortable when no one seems to be totally in charge.”
    I often refer to the passage in the OT where the Israelites demand of God, “Give us king! Give us king!” That shout is heard in most congregations throughout the land as well.
    🙂

  11. Of course, I forgot to add, that once they get their king, the first order of business is to rebel.

Leave a Reply to Michael KruseCancel reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading