The Other Six Days: C3 – The Trinity and the Nature of the Church

The Other Six Days

Part One – A People Without 'Laity and Clergy': Chapter 3 – One God – One People

One God – Three Persons

…Like their God the people of God have ministry that is both creative (making) and restorative (mending); ministry is both unitive (connecting) and curative (correcting) – thus challenging the common evangelical preoccupation with the Great Commission (Mt. 28:19-20) as the exclusive definition of ministry, as important as that mandates is.

To this rich understanding of peoplehood and ministry each of the three persons of the Godhead contributes. The Father creates, providentially sustains, and forms a covenantal framework for all existence. The Son incarnates, mediates, transfigures and redeems. The Spirit empowers and fills with God’s own presence. But each shares in the others – coihneres, interpenetrates, co-operates – so that it is theologically inappropriate to stereotype the ministry of any one. But that is exactly what is done. (57)

Stevens offers this grid on page 58.

 

PEOPLEHOOD

VOCATION

LEADERSHIP

FATHER

Covenant Community

Creational Stewardship

Hierarchical

SON

Kingdom Community

Christocentric Service (continuing works of Jesus)

Servant

SPIRIT

Charismatic Community

Exercising Gifts Empowerment

Charismatic

Stevens observes that denominations tend to favor one aspect of Trinitarian ministry over another.

  • Father-denominations emphasize reverent worship and stewardship. (This would loosely correspond to the traditional mainline denominations like Methodist, Lutheran, Presbyterian, UCC, Episcopal, etc.)
  • Son-denominations stress discipleship and evangelism, thus furthering the work of the Kingdom of God. (This would loosely correspond to more Evangelical denominations.)
  • Spirit-denominations promote gifts and graces. (This would loosely correspond to charismatic denominations.)

Stevens writes, "…we respectfully confess that the unit of the Holy Trinity is neither a homogenized unity that blurs the distinctions, nor a collective." (59) He is concerned that we remember the concept of perichoresis of the "being in one another" aspect of the Trinity. Just as we can talk of three inseparable persons of the Trinity, we can also speak of three inseparable calls to be a covenant, Kingdom, and charismatic community.

Communion or Union?

In the final section of chapter three, Stevens emphasizes that we are in Christ, but we are not lost in Christ. Christ is in us, but we are not Christ. Similarly, the church is not a collection of individuals but a community. Yet we are not lost in, or consumed by, community. Stevens makes the following observations about a perichoretic church:

  • First, there is no such thing as an individual member…. (There is interdependence.)
  • Second, there is no hierarchy of ministries….
  • Third, all members of the laos of God belong to one another, minister to one another, and contribute to the rich unity and ministry of the whole. The church is not composed of those who minister and those who are ministered 'unto.'… (63-63)

This chapter concludes Part 1 of the book "People without 'Laity' and 'Clergy." These first three chapters have framed our problems and how we inherited them. The three chapters that makeup Part 2 examine what it means to be "Summoned and Equipped by God." Central to Stevens thinking in these coming chapters is the "backdrop" he has given us about perichoresis and the Trinitarian view of community and vocation.

Many theologians I have read in recent years have lamented the virtual eclipse of Trinitarian theology over the last few centuries. It strikes me that recovering a healthy ecclesiology is interconnected with a healthy view of the Trinity. 

[Previous] [Next]


Comments

4 responses to “The Other Six Days: C3 – The Trinity and the Nature of the Church”

  1. Dana Ames Avatar
    Dana Ames

    Indeed.
    It seems Trinitarian theology is poised to make a comeback. The sooner the better.
    Love the quote at the top!
    Hope you to to Austin- you’ll get to meet Scot, and Doug Pagitt.
    Dana

  2. I think Austin may be the only date I am not on the road. It would be fun to meet Scot. I have been with Doug on three other occasions.

  3. One very important reason for the dominance of clergy in the church is the illiteracy of the believer. Certainly this has roots even in the NT itself where those who do not know the gospel (in the broadest sense – the life, ministry, words, actions, of Jesus) are asked not to teach and are enjoined instead to learn in silence.
    Even though the printing of the bible and the ability to read led to a partial change starting fom the Reformation, still today, in spite of the internet, the feeling of a knowledge gap (and the lack of formal training) continues to hold back a true sense of empowerment to ministry for the ‘ordinary’ Christian.

  4. Thanks for these thoughts, Sam. Here is where I think we need to get back to theology done in community. Theology is not something someone does by going away to an academy for three years, banking up knowledge, and then goes out into the world to regurgitate it to mindless congregants.
    The Bible is not always self-evident and can not be read as individual in isolation from a community of believers. There are cross-cultural and linguistic issues that have to be dealt with. There is also the experience of the saints who have come before us as they wrestled with the Word in their own day. We need people around who have been equipped to equip others in wrestling with the Word at this level. I think the problem is that we have reduced theology to ONLY this type of work.
    The marketing executive, the doctor, the interior designer, the bricklayer, and the homemaker all know far more about their sphere of work than the pastor can hope to know. The primary locus of theology is each of these people being the Kingdom where they are and wrestling with Word in their context. They gather as a community to share their wisdom and bring their questions from their contexts as they engage the Word. The secondary locus of theology is the pastor who is part of the support system for the primary ministers.
    There will always be novices and veterans. I am not sure that has necessarily led to the rise of clergy. I think clergy emerged more out of sacred/secular split that removed theology out of the hands of the community and delivered it into the hands of the academy elite.

Leave a Reply to Michael KruseCancel reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading