The Other Six Days: C6 – Leadership in the Bible

The Other Six Days

Part Two – Summoned and Equipped by God: Chapter 6 – Ministry – Transcending Clericalism

Leadership in the Bible

"While the New Testament has no place for clergy as a separate category of believer, the Scripture has many references to leaders within God's laos." (145) Stevens notes that "leadership" is described in several ways in the New Testament:

  • Proistemi – "The one who goes before." (Rom. 12:28) He notes it is a verb not a noun.
  • Kybernesis – "Administrators." (1 Corinthians 12:28)
  • Episkopoi – "Overseers" (Philippians 1:1, Acts 20:28, 1 Timothy 3:1) Stevens remarks that this is "a term for minor responsibility" without elaborating.
  • Diakonos – "Servant" (1 Timothy 3:8) Position of lower status.
  • Presbyteroi – "Elders, or older wiser people" (Titus 1:5)
  • Poimenes – "Pastors or shepherds." (Ephesians 4:11)

Stevens then makes this critical observation:

Conspicuously missing from the list of leadership words is ‘priest’ (hiereus), a word which until the end of the second century was reserved for Christ and the whole believing community. (146)

The dilemma for the church is the need for both charisma and institutionalization. Ministry without charisma becomes dead and wooden constitutionalism, focused on power and institutional preservation. Charisma without institution is ever in danger of spilling over into fanaticism and subjectivity.

Some believe they see an evolving distinction between official leaders and charismatic service in the New Testament in response to these pressures. However, Stevens, referring to Gordon Fee, shows that the growing distinction was not between official and charismatic leaders but between itinerant and resident leaders. The local leadership configuration varied from location to location but always had a plurality of leaders. There was no uniform system of government with official offices and titles. What we see is a uniform effort to devise leadership strategies that best equipped the whole laos of God in their many contexts to be ministers in the world! "Rather than having the church assist them to do the work of ministry, leaders are assistants to the rest of the body to empower them for their service in church and world." (149)

And that brings us to a very large elephant in the room. Is there a special call to professional ministry? Stay tuned for that discussion, but what do you think about Steven's leadership assessment so far?

[Previous] [Next]


Comments

4 responses to “The Other Six Days: C6 – Leadership in the Bible”

  1. Without having read Stevens and just responding to what you’ve written…
    I find myself nodding at several points. Wondererd about one choice re: the “dilemna between charisma and institutionalization.” Am wondering if the second word is the best choice here? Seems that “institution” has become such a “loaded term” that it’s going to derail the thought / tension you’re making for some. Not sure what better term to use though: maybe “grounded” or “tradition” (Although that one in itself brings perhaps many unwanted affective meanings for some.)
    Or do we need to use the same words while beging cognizant that we have some deconstruction of the meanings they have usually been attached to?
    Seems to me we’re talking about something new here (for many.) How can we avoid the “lapsing” into safer areas which some of our language will no doubt tempt many to do?
    RPS

  2. I hear your concern. I am thinking of instituion in terms of an ordered pattern of relating to one another. Anytime we get beyond a handful of people, or beyond family boundaries, we are compelled to come to agreement on how we will order our lives in a way to remain connected. Institution need not mean denomination in the traditional sense of the term but I do not believe that we can be the church without protocols for how to connect and interact. I am open to alternative descriptive language.

  3. Good points you’re making… Which leads me back to the drawing board. “New” language is going to have just as many problems as operationally defining more familiar terms in different ways.
    I’m sure open to ideas.
    RPS

  4. I am struggling with language and metaphors as well. I think part of the challenge is to not define a uniform model from the top and impose that outward. Instead, we equip and empower for mission in many contexts letting structure emerge from those contexts. The levels above the local community would serve as nodes linking the many contexts together and helping them cross-pollinate, as it were.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading