Can Europe’s recovery last?

The Economist: Can Europe's recovery last?

Only if its governments take advantage of sunnier times to make deeper reforms.

AS EVERY actor knows, it is easy to be typecast. The role assigned to Europe for the past decade has been that of sclerotic under-achiever: a slow-growing, work-shy and ageing continent that is destined to be left behind by the United States, China and India. Unnoticed by the audience, Europe, under new political leadership first in Germany and Italy and now in France and Britain, has changed the plot. Since the end of 2006 euro-area GDP has outpaced America's: in 2007, it should grow by 2.7%, ahead of both America and Japan. The euro is at new highs against the dollar and the yen. Unemployment has fallen to 7%, the lowest since the euro started life in 1999.

The transformation has been most remarkable in Germany, the biggest European economy, once tarred as “the sick man of Europe”. From 1995 to 2005 German GDP grew at an average of only 1.4% a year. But in the first quarter of 2007 it expanded more than twice as fast, despite a large rise in value-added tax. The 2004 reforms in labour markets and welfare made by the previous government under Gerhard Schröder are bearing fruit. On international definitions, unemployment is down to 6.4%, not much above the level in Britain. German business is doing spectacularly well: the country is again the world's biggest exporter, profits are at a record, competitiveness has improved sharply….


Comments

3 responses to “Can Europe’s recovery last?”

  1. Lars H. Avatar
    Lars H.

    The matter of whether the recovery of the European economy is here to stay is a very interesting one. However, recent numbers and polls for Germany indicate that it is slowly decreasing here.
    Heiko Fassbender explains on the Atlantic Community today that more thorough reforms are needed. Do you also share the impression that the gap between the US and the EU is mainly due to Europeans’ unwillingenss to work more?
    For further reading: Don’t Blame the Welfare State for US-EU Productivity Gap

  2. Lars, thanks for the link.
    My perception is that most of Europe is less friendly to entrepreneurship and overly limits creative destruction. Small businesses are the source of the majority of new jobs every year in the US. Eliminating barriers to starting businesses and to running businesses creates greater competition for lethargic existing businesses. However, businesses must also have the freedom to downsize or close in order to take advantage of changing opportunities. My perception is that much European regulation unduly hampers this ability.
    Working more may be a part of the equation but I perceive that the bigger problem is (relative to the US environment) is an inability to adapt quickly and be dynamic. The trade off in becoming more dynamic is that any given job, company, or even sector becomes more vulnerable to creative destruction to make way for innovation.
    What do you think? Do you think working harder is the answer?

  3. Marriage In Europe

    Here is the legal status of gay marriage in Europe and other parts of the world. Well-Wishers

Leave a Reply to Michael W. KruseCancel reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading