As we leap into this discussion, I think we must ask what wealth is. What is the role of wealth and abundance in the biblical narrative?

I tend to think of wealth as both abundance beyond what is needed for basic subsistence and as anything we possess that can be used for economic exchange. (Do you agree? How else might we describe it?) Community-wide wealth and abundance is the normal condition of the created order, but human rebellion has corrupted it.

According to the biblical narrative, God places the first couple in the garden and gives them a mission. Fill the earth with his eikons and have dominion over the earth as co-creative stewards with God, bringing creation to its fullness. Human rebellion has frustrated that mission. God seeks restoration of shalom through at-one-ment in Christ. We are restored in relationship to God, each other, within ourselves, and nature. That restoration will be completed only at the last day.

The narrative gives us important insights into wealth and abundance. The biblical story begins in a garden and ends in an opulent garden city. Cities were the ancient world's symbol for human community, commerce, government, and art. In the end, God redeems human beings and their contributions to the world. Abraham was given great wealth as a sign of God's covenant. The Pentateuch repeatedly refers to entering "a land flowing with milk and honey." Passages like Deut. 8:6-10 speak of the abundance Israel will have if they keep God's covenant. There will be such abundance that the entire nation can rest from toil every seven years to celebrate Sabbath with God. Isaiah 25 features the great lavish eschatological banquet, which becomes a key theme of Jesus' teaching about the end of time. The description of the New Jerusalem is one of opulence.

Jesus also uses the idea of his people as the oikonomos, the household manager, the one who manages the estate in the householder's absence. It is the word from which we get "economics." God owns all that is, but we are the household managers working the estate and bringing it to fruition according to God's purposes. God brings about wealth, but we are participants with God in the process.

Human beings were not made for bare subsistence. God did not create us as cattle needing only food, water, and shelter. We are creative image-bearers of God. We were meant for stewardship of resources. Certainly, our employment is one way to exhibit these qualities but resources beyond subsistence make it possible for us to create, recreate, and celebrate in other ways. These resources may be put toward learning for learning's sake, for the development of recreational skills, for traveling and experiencing new places, for offering hospitality, or for the enjoyment of creating and maintaining a well-appointed home, to name just a few. God takes great delight in seeing the unique package of proclivities and passions God has developed in us evidenced. It gives glory to God. Abundance allows that to happen.

Having said all this, I feel compelled to make an explicit distinction. What I have just described is not a "name-it-and-claim-it" wealth and prosperity gospel where we manipulate God into providing us with goodies. The prosperity in the Bible is a broadly shared communal wealth that comes from a social ecosystem of covenantal relationships. It is part of the biblical vision of shalom. I just want to be clear here.

Now I've made my case that mere subsistence is not the biblical vision; we are still left with the dilemma that some people live in abundance while many do not. We will come to that issue, but first, I want to ask from where does wealth come?

[Index]


Comments

10 responses to “Living Simply in Abundance (2)”

  1. “…from where does wealth come?”
    Hi Michael,
    I will take a shot. Wealth comes from ownership. When God declared, “Thy shall not steal”, he blessed ownership. Wealth is what we posses as individuals, or as groups, in excess of what we consume.
    We can attain new wealth as a gift from a giver or as the difference between what we give and what we get. We lose wealth when we give more than we get. Some types of wealth, such as love and affection, will also grow by giving.
    Economic transactions can also sometime produce wealth for a seller and a buyer. If the seller has what the buyer wants and the buyer has what the seller wants, both the seller and the buyer will have an increase in wealth if they can agree on a price for the transaction.
    I have more thoughts, but I don’t like long comments, so I hope this comment starts the discussion.

  2. Thanks David. I’m going to try my shot at this topic with my next post. I wonder if others have thoughts?

  3. Hi Michael,
    I’m looking forward to your next post. : – )

  4. Many people with a great deal of stuff are actually poor in many ways. I don’t want to entirely get off the economic track here, but I do want to comment that many folks who have many trappings lack true abundance. Although you do have to have a certain amount of possessions to have abundance, having lots of them doesn’t necessarily mean the owner of them perceives the abundance or acknowledges it. The high income people I have known, with a few remarkable and encouraging examples, are often just as unsettled and searching for more as anyone else. They don’t really have abundance, not “abundant life”, anyway. Sorry for that outburst, I’ll now step off my soapbox and try to behave. 🙂

  5. Nashbabe, I think you are right on topic. I think we will see more of this emerge later. I’m just trying to proceed in small discussable nuggets.

  6. Wealth is a state of mind…how’s that for being cosmic? But really, I am one of those “Ideaists” for whom the saying “to be is to be perceived” rings true. And so, being wealthy is all about right perceptions about what wealth is. This speaks not only to right perception of what wealth is, but also where it comes from…and God, being the ultimate perceived, is the source of all wealth. It comes down to seeking first the kingdom and his righteousness, and then we are able to perceive the wealth that is all around us, that is always coming to us every moment from God’s abundance.
    And, as I’ve been blogging about shalom at my home blog, this is a matter of contentment.

  7. That should be “the ultimate perceiver” …it’s late ;^)

  8. This is a good discussion.
    I agree that we were not created for subsistence.
    We were created in the image of God, so to be fulfilled, we must live a life that images God’s life. That includes being creative, productive, loving, caring and exercising authority.
    I see wealth as opportunity. The man with the five talents had more opportunity than the man with one. Giving away all your wealth is a bit like burying a talent in the ground. It is a wasted opportunity.
    Wealth provides access to goods and services that we do not need for survival. Those goods and services can be translated into human capital. They can be used to make us more productive in the service of other people.
    Wealth also brings responsibility. I have to choose between using my wealth for my own pleasure or in serving others. I will have to give account to God for how I have used my wealth.

  9. “to be is to be perceived”
    Or as one of my favorite sociologists, Peter Berger said “What is perceived as real is real in its consequences.” I think there is a lot of truth in what you say but I’d add a couple of things.
    First, economic studies repeatedly show that wealth is highly correlated with happiness up to a fairly basic level of subsistance. After, that there is no correlation between economic wealth and happiness. Once we are past that basic level is where I think perception begins to play a much bigger role.
    Second, since perception is so important, it is important to have “plausibility structures” (ala Peter Berger) that refelct back to us that our perceptions are indeed legitimate. That’s why having Christian community that reflects back to us appropriate valuation is so important. Otherwise, we just “go native” with the surruonding culture.

  10. Ron, I’m enjoying this discussion too. I really appreciate the presence of so many thoughtful people here to help me think this out.
    Good comments. Thanks.

Leave a Reply to nashbabeCancel reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading