Is climate sensitive to solar variablity?

Physics Today: Is climate sensitive to solar variability? (HT: Planet Gore)

…The nonequilibrium thermodynamic models we used suggest that the Sun is influencing climate significantly more than the IPCC report claims. If climate is as sensitive to solar changes as the above phenomenological findings suggest, the current anthropogenic contribution to global warming is significantly overestimated. We estimate that the Sun could account for as much as 69% of the increase in Earth’s average temperature, depending on the TSI reconstruction used.5 Furthermore, if the Sun does cool off, as some solar forecasts predict will happen over the next few decades, that cooling could stabilize Earth’s climate and avoid the catastrophic consequences predicted in the IPCC report.

This study was funded by an Army Research Office Grant. I had no idea that the Army was now working for Exxon. 🙂

In related news, the BBC did an article back in July 2004, Sunspots reaching 1,000-year high:

Scientists based at the Institute for Astronomy in Zurich used ice cores from Greenland to construct a picture of our star's activity in the past.

They say that over the last century the number of sunspots rose at the same time that the Earth's climate became steadily warmer.

The warming is being amplified by gases from fossil fuel burning, they argue.

Sunspots have been monitored on the Sun since 1610, shortly after the invention of the telescope. They provide the longest-running direct measurement of our star's activity.

The variation in sunspot numbers has revealed the Sun's 11-year cycle of activity as well as other, longer-term changes.

In particular, it has been noted that between about 1645 and 1715, few sunspots were seen on the Sun's surface.

This period is called the Maunder Minimum after the English astronomer who studied it.

It coincided with a spell of prolonged cold weather often referred to as the "Little Ice Age". Solar scientists strongly suspect there is a link between the two events – but the exact mechanism remains elusive. …

Meanwhile, meteorologist Anthony Watts has been updating the Sun's present cycle. The Ap magnetic index measures magnetic activity from the Sun, strongly correlated with sunspot activity. As I understand it, we've reached a cyclical minimum and are due for an upswing in activity this month. However, concerning the Ap magnetic index, Watts writes:

This is the one that worries me though, as I’ve pointed out before, we have that step function (or discontinuity) in 2005 (see red arrows) which gives the impression that something just “switched off” in the solar magnetic dynamo:

Apmagindex

See here we are on March 18, 2008. What does the Sun look like?

Sunspots

(Source: SOHO)

Spotless! Stay tuned.


Comments

10 responses to “Is climate sensitive to solar variablity?”

  1. Spot on, Michael!
    But I’ve heard that some of these studies by global warming “deniers” encouraging activities that accelerate global warming are actually funded by the North Dakota Citrus Growers Association!

  2. “North Dakota Citrus Growers Association!”
    LOL
    Maybe you haven’t heard. A janitor who works at the NDCGA, used a coupon to get a free oil change at an Exxon station in 1996. The makes the NDCGA a front organization for big oil. 😉
    Besides, as pointed out by the North Dakota Hurricane Monitoring Center, everyone knows you can’t grow Citrus in ND. 🙂

  3. This corresponds more or less exactly (certainly to within epsilon) with Roger Pielke Sr’s estimates of the anthropogenic contribution to warming.

  4. Anthony Watts also has some awesome research on the moving of weather stations. Many stations around the country have been moved from fields, and posted either right next to or on black topped parking lots. Of course these stations then indicate “global warming”. Follow the money. Al Gore started a company that sells “indulgences” I mean carbon credits.
    I heard that Al’s going to start selling “fidelity credits” too. Those who are faithful to their spouses can be paid by those who aren’t thus clearing the conscience of the un-faithful. Makes about as much sense.
    The last time sunspot activity was this low, we entered a mini ice age. Check out the Dalton minimum.
    So which scientists do we believe? Is it better to be a global warming “denier” or a global warming “chicken little” alarmist?

  5. Thanks Charlie. Do you happen to have a link to his discussion of this?

  6. Thanks Dave. I keep meaning to do some posts on Watts surfacestation program but haven’t gotten their yet.
    “I heard that Al’s going to start selling “fidelity credits” too. Those who are faithful to their spouses can be paid by those who aren’t thus clearing the conscience of the un-faithful.”
    LOL. Nice!
    I too have read three different scientists comparisons to previous times this phenom has happened.
    As to the last questions, I think it is best to be prudent risk assessment analyst because we can never be certain on such matters.

  7. Hey Mike!
    By the way. Just in case there is even an iota of doubt…… The thing about “fidelity credits” is called sarcasm. Although I do believe that they make about as much sense as carbon credits.
    It’s also interesting to point out that the temperature on Mars is rising. It must be those darn robots that we sent there. But wait a minute, I thought that they were electrically powered solar robots. Hmmmm…..

  8. “…temperature on Mars is rising.”
    And Jupiter as well.

  9. Calling skeptics ‘deniers’ is BULLSHIT.
    The coming Dalton Minimum is going to wipe out faux agw over the next 10 years.

  10. Come on, Otter. Tell me what you really think. 😉

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading