Baseball Rule Trivia. Four Outs in an Inning?

I've watched a lot of baseball over the years. I collected baseball cards. I've read baseball history. I've memorized the stats of the great players. I've even made the pilgrimage to Cooperstown. I know a little something about baseball.

So last Saturday, Mrs. Kronicle and I were playing the biography version of Trivial Pursuit when a question came up, "What are the most strikeouts recorded by a major league pitcher in an inning?" The answer is four. How is that possible? Here is an explanation of how it has been done at Baseball Almanac:

… A batter with two strikes on him takes a swing at strike three; however, the catcher does not field the ball cleanly, and instead of tagging the runner out, the runner reaches. The strikeout is recorded, but not the out.

Of course, The trick is that four strikeouts were recorded but only three outs. The link lists the forty-seven pitchers (if I counted right) who have done it. (I believe I detect an inordinate number of knuckleballers in the list. That would help explain why catchers were having trouble with the ball.) If I'm reading it right, Chuck Finley did this three times in one game in 2000.

But now to the real question. The next day I'm watching the Royals and the Yankees on the tube out of the corner of my eye. The Yankees have a runner on first with two outs. The batter has two strikes. Now I missed the specifics of what happened on the pitch. The batter struck out, but I didn't see if he swung or the catcher caught it cleanly. The next thing I saw was the catcher firing to second. The throw was a little off, and the runner was safe, but since the strikeout was the third out, the inning was over. However, the announcer noted that had the runner been thrown out, it would have been four outs, and the next inning would have been played with two outs! I've never heard of such a thing.

I did some web searching to see what I could learn about this. Someone presented this scenario:

Two outs, runners on second and third. Batter hits a grounder to third. The third baseman tags the runner going from second to third. The home plate umpire rules the runner from third crosses home before the tag is made, therefore the run would count since the tag play is not a force out. Being the quick thinker, the third basemen notices the batter just jogging and then stopping after the tag was made, fires to the first getting the fourth out on the batter, therefore nullifying the run.

Does anyone know what might have been going on with the Royals scenario I mentioned? Is the above situation a scenario for four outs? Have you ever seen four outs happen? I'm skeptical.


Comments

6 responses to “Baseball Rule Trivia. Four Outs in an Inning?”

  1. Michael, my son and I were watching that same ballgame when LaFevre made that comment. I took it as a silly attempt at humor, which I think they do a pretty good job with most of the time. Man did the Royals blow one last night!

  2. That makes me feel better. At least I wasn’t dreaming this. 🙂 Like I say, I wasn’t paying full attention but it did get me wondering.
    My understanding is that when there are three outs the inning is done. A strikeout, while still a “strikeout,” is not an “out” unless the catcher catches the ball. Therefore, there is no third out.
    In the second scenario, the fielder made a choice of who where to go for the out. The out at third means the inning is over, the player going to first is no longer an issue. If the fielder goes to first, then the inning is over. Either way, when either of those outs is made, we’re done.
    As to the Royals …. big sigh. This is becoming an all to common theme. During their 12 game skid they blew a five run lead in the ninth. The had the lead three times in a game versus the Yankees an 11-10 lead going into the 9th before losing that one. The yesterday. Like I say, big sigh. 🙂

  3. Being the quick thinker, the third basemen notices the batter just jogging and then stopping after the tag was made, fires to the first getting the fourth out on the batter, therefore nullifying the run.
    This seems a little suspect and it raises yet another question: Since the third out (that should have ended that half of the inning) was essentially a fielder’s choice, does the last batter lead off the next at bat?

  4. I have no clue. The whole thing is fishy to me.

  5. Robert F. Avatar
    Robert F.

    Noticed this question never was answered. The best way to understand, is to look at what happens when runners tag up on a fly ball. Runners at second and third, one out. Fly ball to left. Second out. Runners tag up. Fielder throws to third base. Runner is out. Third out. Runner from third touches home plate. Does his run score? The answer is it depends. Did he touch home plate before the out at third?
    This applies to the grounder. On a non-force play, if a runner touches home plate before the last out is made, his run scores. If there is a force play for the last out (or fly ball), it doesn’t matter if three runners cross the plate.
    I’m not sure if it has ever happened, but imagine it’s the 9th inning. The home team down by two runs, bases loaded. The batter hits a long drive to clear the bases, but as he runs to first, his leg buckles. He falls to the ground. The first baseman sees the runner is down. He calls for the ball. He taps first, third out on a force. Game over. Home team loses.
    Does the name bone-head Merkle ring a bell? He cost the New York Giants the National League pennant, when he didn’t tag second on a two out “single” that scored the “winning” run..
    Five outs is possible. It’s never happened, yet. Bases loaded, one out. Deep fly ball. Runners go. Outfielder catches the ball at the fence, crashes into it, but hangs onto the ball. Second out. He takes a while to throw the ball in. Runners keep running. The first two score before the ball gets home. Trail runner out at the plate. Third out. But the defense must throw the ball to second and third, and appeal. If they don’t, the runs count. The last out wasn’t a force, or fly ball. Five outs, or runs score. You thought four outs were strange.

  6. Interesting scenario. That is the most plausible description I’ve heard.
    I’m still skeptical that these 4th and 5th “outs” would technically be scored as outs in the recordkeeping. I also suspect that once the third out was recorded at home the inning would be over, thus no ability to throw back to third or second. (With Merkle there were only two outs as I recall.) Had the throw gone to second or third, that would have been the third out with no other outs possible. In other words, it would be fielders choice of how to get the third out but there would only be one more out to be had.
    Still, I love the scenario.

Leave a Reply to brad briscoCancel reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading