Cell Phone Service, But No Toilets

IPS: Cell Phone Service, But No Toilets

UXBRIDGE, Canada, Oct 20 (IPS) – It is a fact of the 21st century that some of the poorest regions of the world have good mobile phone coverage but no toilets or safe drinking water.

Simply installing toilets where needed and ensuring safe water supplies would do more to end crippling poverty and improve world health than any other possible measure, according to an analysis released Monday by the United Nations University (UNU).

"Water problems, caused largely by an appalling absence of adequate toilets in many places, contribute tremendously to some of the world's most punishing problems, foremost among them the inter-related afflictions of poor health and chronic poverty," said Zafar Adeel, director of the U.N. University's Canadian-based International Network on Water, Environment and Health.

The UNU analysis says better water and sanitation reduces poverty by boosting individual productivity, reducing public health costs and creating new business opportunities for local entrepreneurs.

Every dollar invested in sanitation generates eight to 10 dollars in reduced costs and increased productivity Adeel told IPS.

So why is it that there are mobile phone networks and not sanitation networks?

"Experts have not done a good job of explaining the consequences of poor sanitation to the public or policy makers," Adeel said.

For that reason developing countries are more interested in generating exports or economic development and ignore the costs of poor sanitation. Donor countries and aid agencies have a similar focus, choosing to improve drug delivery or develop new drugs instead of making sanitation a top priority. …


Comments

One response to “Cell Phone Service, But No Toilets”

  1. Two thoughts spring to mind:
    1. Cell phone coverage is a phenomenon of private enterprise and makes a profit, whereas water and sewerage are almost everywhere regarded as “public services” that should be free or nearly so. Hence, it’s no surprise that cell providers would be ahead of the curve.
    2. I have no numbers to back this up, but I suspect that providing universal cell phone coverage is infinitely cheaper than providing universal sewerage and water service, at least along traditional lines.
    Fifteen years ago, Kurdish authorities in northern Iraq chose to open the market up to cell phone providers rather than re-run tens of thousands of miles of copper phone lines that had been destroyed by the Iraqi army. By doing so, they were able to provide universal coverage for a fraction of the cost, in a fraction of the time, with no public money.
    Again, I don’t know much about these things, but I would have to imagine that running water lines (which involves the cost of pipe, excavating, etc.) – or even digging thousands of wells – is much more expensive than erecting cell towers every 15 miles or so. I agree that the lack of adequate sanitation is a scandal, but the presence of cell phone coverage in the same places most certainly is not.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading