Marginal Revolution: How to give directions Tyler Cowen
…there are two ways to give directions. One is using a so-called "route perspective", as in the example above. This adopts a first-person spatial perspective and is characterised by references to turns and landmarks. The other is a so-called "survey perspective", which gives directions as if looking down upon a map. This type of direction giving is characterised by references to cardinal directions (North, South, East and West) and precise distances.
And which is better?
When Hund's team used a fictitious model town made of plywood to test the ability of undergraduates to follow directions, they uncovered a curious anomaly. The students reported finding route perspective directions easier to follow and yet they steered a toy car to a destination more quickly and effectively when they were following cardinal directions. …
I tend to prefer receiving cardinal directions, but that is partly because I live in the Midwest, where the world is laid out more or less according to a grid. Having also lived in Philadelphia for a while, I found cardinal directions much more challenging. The grid disappears once you leave the city proper, and landmarks become more critical. I tend to give cardinal and landmark directions when I'm asked for directions; saying things in more than one way will improve success.
Leave a Reply