Prosperity: Final Thoughts on “The Bottom Billion”

Over the past eight posts in this series on Paul Collier's The Bottom Billion, we have briefly surveyed four poverty traps and four instruments that free the poor from those traps. The four traps are:

  • The Conflict Trap
  • The Natural Resources Trap
  • The Landlocked by Bad Neighbors Trap
  • The Bad Governance in a Small Country

The four instruments for breaking free from these traps were:

  • Aid
  • Military Intervention
  • Laws and Charters
  • Trade Policy and Reversing Marginalization

In the book's final chapter, Collier lays out an agenda and identifies pitfalls that need to be avoided. I'm not going to delve into those here. If you are interested in these issues, I'd recommend reading the book.

Instead, I want to highlight two emphases Collier lifts. First, Collier writes:

"In the 1930s the world sleepwalked into the avoidable catastrophe of World War II because electorates in the United States and Europe were too lazy to think beyond the populist recipes of isolationism and pacifism. These mistakes led to the slaughter of their children. It is the responsibility of all citizens to prevent us from sleepwalking into another avoidable catastrophe that our children would have to fact." (176)

The second emphasis is that, yes, we need aid, particularly in building infrastructure to improve the wheels of poor economies. But we desperately need trade. Collier identifies public opinion as the primary obstacle to the aid community transforming more prosperous and sustainable economies. Various activist groups deeply poison the well against these needed shifts. Regrettably, many Christians, including many of my PCUSA tribe and the emerging church, are some of the most vocal opponents.

If nothing else, I hope these posts on Collier's book have illustrated the great complexity of the issues and the intractable nature of the problems facing the bottom billion. Sloganeering calls for "Free markets!" and "Redistribute the wealth!" are, in the end, merely words that nurture the sanctimony of the sloganeers and do precious little to address the context of "the least of these." These issues are difficult to digest and sometimes require counterintuitive, even paradoxical, responses relative to our surface reading of the scripture. While the world may be content with identity politics, our identity is from one who leads us, if need be, to sacrifice our standing with right-wing activists or approval of intellectuals in the academy for his mission.

I will try to pull this whole series back together in the next post.

[Previous] [Next] [Index]


Comments

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading