The ‘Green Jobs’ Myth

Wall Street Journal: The 'Green Jobs' Myth

European workers aren't believers.

The United Nations is huddling in Poznan, Poland, this week to negotiate a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, but the real news is that part of the global "consensus" on climate change seems to be unraveling. To wit, the myth of "green jobs."

In Brussels last week, some 11,000 metal workers clogged the EU quarter to protest global-warming policies. They worry that their industry could be harmed and their jobs forced overseas; some of them carried coffins as props. Most of the marching workers were from Germany, where auto makers are also still fuming over new emissions standards. Audi and BMW and other carbon-using industries have argued both for shallower emissions cuts and a longer phase-in period.

Meanwhile, Poland is threatening to veto a new EU climate-change accord unless restrictions on its coal use are eased. And Italy's government complains that new green policies could cost its industry up to €20 billion a year over the next decade. California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger appeared at Poznan by video, asserting that green measures "will also revive our economies."

But not everyone is buying it. As Stefania Prestigiacomo, Italy's environment minister, has noted, "Some people claim environmental measures are a way to relaunch industry, but we have to be realistic. Resources are limited, and they will be even more so because of the economic crisis."

This is certainly a new tune for the Europeans, who have lectured Americans for more than a decade to sign Kyoto because the planet is in peril. Their happy talk of a painless 20% reduction in emissions by 2020 has been mugged by reality. Carbon emission regulations come at a high price in lost jobs and lost competitiveness. …


Comments

4 responses to “The ‘Green Jobs’ Myth”

  1. There was never any “happy talk of a painless 20% reduction in emissions by 2020”
    These targets were always discussed by environmental professionals and scientists as being hard to meet. Even politicians have been stressing the need for emissions reductions in a ‘serious’ manner.
    WSJ reporting like this smacks of reactionary tabloidism, not serious news.

  2. vanskaamper Avatar
    vanskaamper

    I beg to differ. The WSJ is giving air to dissenting opinions that are badly needed in this debate.
    The historical fact is that when governments pick their favored industries and causes, the net result is a loss of jobs, productivity, and efficiency.
    The Green movement will be no different if it skews, distorts, or ignores market forces and economic reality.

  3. I agree that balance is important. But stooping to the misrepresentation of “europeans” is poor journalism.

  4. vanskaamper Avatar
    vanskaamper

    I’m not sure I understand your criticism. It’s unquestionably clear that the EU and European states have taken the lead in trying to green up their industries. I don’t see any unfair stereotyping, particularly in light of the fact that the dissenters cited are Europeans as well.

Leave a Reply to phil_styleCancel reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading