Learning from Secular Nations

Christianity Today: Learning from Secular Nations

In 'godless' Scandinavia, people are content. Is that enough?

Scandinavians are content, caring people who don't worry too much about what happens after they die. And they aren't a tad bit religious (well, maybe a tad, but just barely). Phil Zuckerman, sociologist and author of Society without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us about Contentment (NYU Press), spent 14 months in Scandinavia and witnessed a compassionate way of life and societal well-being. He contrasts Danes and Swedes with the marginally less-contented and less-charitable folks in the United States, who nevertheless show great religious zeal. He asks, "Is a society to be considered moral if its citizens love the Bible a lot (as in the United States), or rather, if its citizens virtually wipe out poverty from their midst (as in Scandinavia)?"…

… But Zuckerman flubs a fundamental point: He confuses a contented life with a good life. Zuckerman frankly admits the lack of purpose expressed by many Scandinavians. They aren't troubled by the need to find it either, but are satisfied living their lives without being overly concerned about the larger meaning of life or what happens after death. He claims that they find meaning enough in good friendships and family life. I won't deny the real delight—a common grace—to be found in these relationships, but is that really enough?

Zuckerman sells humanity short. If people are content but no longer care about transcendent meaning and purpose or life beyond death, that's not a sign of greatness but tragic forgetfulness. Their horizon of concern is too narrow. They were made for more. What does it profit a society if, as this book's jacket notes, it gains "excellent educational systems, strong economies, well-supported arts, free health care, egalitarian social policies, outstanding bike paths, and great beer," but loses its soul? Can a country build strong social systems and keep its soul? While I am thankful for Zuckerman's reminder about Christianity's social implications, and the example of a place that meets those obligations differently than we do, I am sad he misses the rest.

 


Comments

9 responses to “Learning from Secular Nations”

  1. The folks in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World were “content”, too.
    Also, as Arthur Brooks has shown, Americans are by far the most charitable people on the Earth.

  2. I was thinking the same thing about “Brave New World” when I linked this. Instead of an actual drug, government becomes the narcotic that renders a state of blissful complacency.
    You mention charity. Another issue is innovation and adaptation for addressing new challenges that face us. I think robust markets make that possible.

  3. Hmm…thanks for sharing this Mike. Strangely enough I cannot recall any Scandinavian earth-shattering philosophical or theological work…no matter how hard I try to think about it. However I can easily come up with a large number of contributions to the world of Philosophy form German, British and American authors, works of great value which have altered the course of mankind along the lines of ontology of epistemology.
    I do not envy one’s subsidized existence at all, especially when it involves no contribution whatsoever to the betterment of mankind.

  4. Good point.
    Iceland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland make to the nations with the Scandinavian model. Total population of 25 million, Sweden being the largest with less than 10 million. They are small highly homogeneous societies without the burden of significant national defense expenditures. To a degree, they free ride on the security created by other nations.
    Total fertility rates have dropped to around 1.7 or so, which means, barring immigration, these societies are dying. It is questionable how long their model can be sustained.
    Assuming it could be sustained, I think there are significant questions about the practicality of using the model for a diverse 300 million strong U. S. population that spans a continent.
    There are trade-offs no matter what you chose.

  5. vanskaamper Avatar
    vanskaamper

    I think there are significant questions about the practicality of using the model for a diverse 300 million strong U. S. population that spans a continent.
    That’s definitely one way to put it. You have a gift for understatement, Michael.

  6. Its a gift. 🙂

  7. On a completely anecdotal note: Everyone know the best music is made during times of struggle. Scandanavians might be ‘content’ but what of their music . . . . . .? 😉

  8. Well, there was Abba when we were struggling through the 1970s. 🙂
    I don’t want to be to hard on Scandinavia in terms of world accomplishments. All five countries combined have 25 million people in a world of 6.7 billion. If they made the average contribution they would still rarely be heard from.
    Of course, Texas has 25 million people. So we know such a small group can do great cultural harm. (Disclosure: I was born in Oklahoma.) 🙂

  9. vanskaamper Avatar
    vanskaamper

    Yikes.
    In the 70’s we had Jimmy Carter and ABBA.
    Now, in the early 2000’s we have an ABBA encore in the inexplicably popular film Mama Mia.
    If I’m doing the math correctly, we should be looking for an inexplicably popular Jimmy Carter encore during the same time period.
    Keep your eyes open, people…

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading