David Brooks: A moderate manifesto

International Herald Tribune: David Brooks: A moderate manifesto

You wouldn't know it some days, but there are moderates here in the United States – moderate conservatives, moderate liberals, just plain moderates. We sympathize with a lot of the things that President Obama is trying to do. We like his investments in education and energy innovation. We support health care reform that expands coverage while reducing costs.

But the Obama budget is more than just the sum of its parts. There is, entailed in it, a promiscuous unwillingness to set priorities and accept trade-offs. There is evidence of a party swept up in its own revolutionary fervor – caught up in the self-flattering belief that history has called upon it to solve all problems at once.

So programs are piled on top of each other and we wind up with a gargantuan $3.6 trillion budget. We end up with deficits that, when considered realistically, are $1 trillion a year and stretch as far as the eye can see. We end up with an agenda that is unexceptional in its parts but that, when taken as a whole, represents a social-engineering experiment that is entirely new. …

…The U.S. has always had vibrant neighborhood associations. But in its very first budget, the Obama administration raises the cost of charitable giving. It punishes civic activism and expands state intervention. …

…Those of us who consider ourselves moderates – moderate-conservative, in my case – are forced to confront the reality that Barack Obama is not who we thought he was. His words are responsible; his character is inspiring. But his actions betray a transformational liberalism that should put every centrist on notice. As Clive Crook, an Obama admirer, wrote in The Financial Times, the Obama budget "contains no trace of compromise. It makes no gesture, however small, however costless to its larger agenda, of a bipartisan approach to the great questions it addresses. It is a liberal's dream of a new New Deal." …

The last paragraph I quoted nails it. Throughout the election, I heard from many quarters what a centrist and consensus builder Obama is. My worries about his liberal voting record (most liberal senate member) were just part of my conservative paranoia. I saw zero evidence of "Obama, the centrist" in his slim political record leading up to his election. What I saw is likely the most radical left-wing candidate we've ever elected who can charm people with his disarming smile and non-anxious presence. I have yet to see anything that evidences a consensus-building centrist. I'm also not holding my breath.

I may be paranoid. But being paranoid doesn't mean someone isn't out to get you. 🙂


Comments

6 responses to “David Brooks: A moderate manifesto”

  1. Michael,
    Thanks for posting this. Exactly what needs to be heard … and FAST!
    Any hope that the right folks are listening?

  2. Michael, I know you are a sane writer so I read you partly to check on my on sanity about Obama. I read Catholic sites to check on the morality issues–and some Presbyterian sites: ) Anyway thank you for the posting.

  3. vanskaamper Avatar
    vanskaamper

    Well, you know it’s nice that Brooks finally gets it right in that last paragraph, but it’s too little too late. All the evidence was there during the campaign…why did Brooks think Obama was anything other than he was…a smiling, smooth talking, unreconstructed campus radical?
    Brooks (and others like him) chose to ignore the warnings of those who closely scrutinized Obama’s past actions (economics, abortion, gun control) and associations. Brooks, like so many other people, was hypnotized by the siren song of Obama’s reasonable sounding, but carefully and cynically worded rhetoric.
    Rahm Emanuel–in what I think was a “man behind the curtain” moment that was very telling for anyone paying attention–said that “you never let a good crisis go to waste.”
    This can only mean that you exploit a moment of misfortune as an opportunity to advance a political agenda that would otherwise not be embraced by your..um…subjects.
    Whether it’s abortion, gun rights, labor unions, immigration policy, taxes, etc., ignore the speeches and pay close attention to the actual legislation.
    These people are all about getting as much done as they can to fundamentally move the country to the left while they have their big majorities.
    It’s NOT paranoia if they’re really out to get you.
    :^o

  4. Thx for sharing this.. it is well thought out and reflects much of my thinkings.
    Unfortunately the GOP hasn’t come up with a great presidential candidate for 2012.. time is slipping away.. Obama surfaced in 2004.. all we got these days is the Rush Limbaugh nonsense.

  5. This article seems to have struck a chord. I heard it referenced at three different media outlets today.
    Peggy
    I think Brooks is simply articulating what a whole bunch of folks are already feeling.
    Viola
    Thanks. I try my best not to go to hyperbole but I confess I really am troubled by what I see. I’m not just trying to push buttons.
    Van
    I’m not as concerned about the “wasting a good crisis” remark. There is truth in it. The problem is what direction he wants to change things. And frankly, watching this stimulus package unfold, I’m wondering how much Obama is guiding this thing and how much of it is him simply being swept up in a flow from the Democrats in Congress. I can’t get a clear sense of what is going on but it isn’t pretty to my eyes.
    Kansas Bob
    Lack of leadership in the GOP has been a persistent problem in recent years. Republicans have been resting on past laurels for some time now; merely content not to lose power instead of lead. I suspect they got what was coming to them.

  6. vanskaamper Avatar
    vanskaamper

    The problem is what direction he wants to change things.
    Yes. That’s exactly why you should be worried about the comment.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading