The Missing Purpose

Recently I was reading a book by a pastor who I admire. He wrote something I think reflects a pervasive mindset among pastors and theologians. It is something that troubles me. The source isn't important since it restates what so many others have written, but it is a mindset that I pray will change.

The author is inviting readers to reflect on what our life purpose might be. The author writes:

We were created to care for God's Creation. We were created to love God and to love our neighbors as ourselves. We were created to care for our families and those in need. We were created to glorify God, to seek justice, and to do mercy. To be a Christian is to follow Jesus Christ and to seek his will in our lives. It is to say, "Here I am, all of me! I'm yours. Put me to work, help me to serve, use me to accomplish your work."

I fully agree with everything listed, but do you notice anything missing?

Genesis tells us that God created humanity in God's image. God created them for community and to exercise dominion over the earth. "Exercising dominion" is not synonymous with "preservationist," though preserving beauty and creation are elements of it. Dominion is about bringing the world to its fulfillment. As human beings, we are part of that world. It means bringing humanity to the highest state possible. We transform matter, energy, and information from less useful and desirable forms into more useful and desirable forms. It is a mission marred by sin but still our mission.

When God established Israel, God did not just create a people. God created a people and placed them within a land. They were each allotted a portion of the land to work (i.e., transform matter, energy, and information into more useful forms) for their benefit and the benefit of their neighbors through exchange. So important was creative, productive labor that God established the Jubilee to ensure that no Israelite would ever be permanently alienated from his labor and land. The biblical narrative envisions that one day, all the earth is God's land, and all the people are his people exercising dominion over it.

Finally, when we look at the sweep of the biblical narrative, the story begins in a garden and ends in a garden city, the New Jerusalem. Cities were the symbol in the ancient world for the highest human achievement. Cities included art, commerce, and government. The biblical story ends with human contributions being incorporated into the eternal city.

What is missing from the list above is work. As God's co-creative stewards, one of the central reasons we were put here was to transform matter, energy, and information from less useful forms into more desirable forms. In communion, we do not take part in the grain and grape but in the bread and the wine, both of which require human labor. Work is what the great majority of us spend most of the hours of our days doing. It is a central expression of our image-bearing nature. 

The mission of Jesus Christ is redemption and restoration of humanity and all creation. The work of the Church is for a season until Christ's work is complete; then the Church shall be at rest. But co-creative stewardship, whether in Eden, now, or the New Jerusalem, is our human mission that flows out of our union with God. The redemption and restoration of work humanity surely has work as part of its agenda.

Yet in lists like these, it simply is absent. One is left to question why. Is it simply because productive labor is beyond the horizon of those who make such lists? Is it because of ambivalence about the marketplace and those who work in it? Whatever the case, the message is, even to those who haven't consciously caught it, that our work is of no significance to God and his purposes other than in some instrumental role of support for other items on the list.


Comments

15 responses to “The Missing Purpose”

  1. Preservation and conservation still play a role in a productive society. I would argue that there are certain natural processes/environments that must be left as-is without any human ‘betterment’ in order to simply exist. Maintaining ecological diversity cannot co-exist in certain circumstances when human intervention is invovled – some environments are non-human environments.
    It’s about balance. I think the Rio-conferecne defintion of sustainability recognises this – the need to BALANCE the use of resources today without compromising the needs of the future. At the same time, the precautionary principle warns us that, in the absence of information we should incorporate assumptions regarding negative impacts into our resource use plans. This is party of protecting for the future.

  2. I fully agree, Phil. The author mentions “care for God’s Creation,” and as noted, I fully agree with that. Its what’s missing that troubles me.
    In the recent past, our purpose has been truncated relationship with god. With the rise of environmentalism and the desire to become less dualistic about spirit and matter, we see “creation care” now added to the picture. Both the old and the new versions are utterly blind to work.
    As Darrell Cosden notes, nature is both our home and the subject of our work. I embrace both in the context of stewardship.

  3. Dana Ames Avatar
    Dana Ames

    “Co-creative stewardship, whether in Eden, now, or in the New Jerusalem, is our human mission that flows out of our union with God.”
    In the EO view, all that can be said to promote Life flows from our union with God, which is our ultimate end, the whole point of Jesus’ incarnation and work.
    So you agree… 😉
    Dana

  4. Amen!
    (Oh wait … that’s Baptist … what do EOs say?)

  5. What I notice here is not the absence of work– I notice the absence of redemption. Creating is God’s great work in the world; where is sin? Where is Christ’s work on the cross? This is the really important missing piece in our theology inside the PC(USA) today. A theology of work is a part of the redeeming work of Christ– our vocation. This used to be our strong point as Reformed/Calvinist Christians. If we were created to love, and we can love without redemption, what is Christ’s purpose? A Christ who does no work is the Lord of a Church that has forgotten how to work.

  6. Interesting Clay. He wrote about loving God and following Jesus, which I took, as proxy for what you are saying, but you’re right that he doesn’t drive this home.
    I could make a case that our participation in Christ’s redemptive work is part of our mission but it is not the purpose for which we were made. If it were our purpose, then when the New Creation is fulfilled, we would cease to have a purpose. It is a temporary mission whereas work is part of human ontology. But between then and now, the work of redemption is in the warp and woof of all we do.
    “This used to be our strong point as Reformed/Calvinist Christians.”
    And all too sadly, the operative words are “used to be.”

  7. ceemac Avatar
    ceemac

    Michael,
    In the strain of Chrisitianity (Southern Revivalistic Pietism) that I grew up in “work” was seen as a punishment. (Genesis 3:19). I think the idea that Adam/Eve worked in the Garden and that there would be work in Heaven would have been seen as heresy of sorts. If not heresy at least a theological oddity.
    Just a hunch that your ideas about work are a challenge to folks on the Theo. right as well as left

  8. Interesting Ceemac. I’ve heard a few on the right articulate the case that work was result of the fall, but mostly it just seems to be that the material world will end and we all become spiritual beings. Thus material matters, including work, have no consequence.

  9. Rick McGinniss Avatar
    Rick McGinniss

    I’m with Clay in that my first thought was “evangelism.”
    However, I think that in defining the original purpose for humans (not Christians), “work” makes more sense. In the perfect world, there was/is no need for evangelism.

  10. R. Paul Stevens makes this distinction clear in his book “The Other Six Days.” We have a “human” vocation of creation stewardship, which includes both protection and production. We have a Christian vocation to carry on the works of Jesus Christ. Human redemption is not just a “spiritual” redemption but a redemption of our entire humanity.
    I’d say the purpose of evangelism is to call people into reconciled community with God and his people to be sent out as witnesses to what image-bearers, redeemed in all their human capacities look like.
    Work is a central human capacity that is virtually ignored.

  11. Sometimes the web world moves too fast and I’m just now responding to your response.
    Earlier mentioned out that in what I called Southern Revivalistic Pietism work was seen punishment.
    I will admit to oversimplifying based on my own experience
    My point being that the American protestant church, outside of the relativley small Reformed circle, has not tended to view work in a postive light.
    And I think you have a much bigger hill to climb in making your point than you might think.
    I find it intersting that you have only heard a few articulate the case that work is the result of the fall. After all I am talking about a pretty large segment of the US protestant church.
    You used the term materialistic. The term I would have heard growing up would have been worldly vs spiritual.
    If we were to take a survey of the most popular Gospel songbooks (not hymnals) from 1875-1975* I wonder:
    1. How many positive references to any earthly work other than “soul winning” would we find?
    2. How many references to work in heaven would we find comapred to descprions of heaven as a place of incredible consumption along with never ending worship.
    Now I have rejected much of my religious upbringing. I do believe the concept of a vocation for each of us and what we do on earth matters.
    But I am still inclined to embrace the idea that the Kingdom of God in all of it’s fullness is going to be one continuous “all day dinner on the grounds.”
    * I would end at 1975 becuase about that there is a shift toward “worldly” concerns in this strain beginning with the rise of the Moral Majority. That would be followed by the mega church “10 steps to a happy this or that” and even the prosperity gospel.

  12. By the way I don’t have any problem with you working in the kingdom if you want to. But I’m headed for the dessert table. There’s a pecan pie waiting there that hasn’t been tainted by sin.

  13. Ceemac my point would be that work has for the most part simply been ignored as opposed to being identified as evil and a result of the fall. The sacred vs. secular split is real but just work hasn’t generally been perceived as fallen, doesn’t mean it has been embraced as good either.
    “But I am still inclined to embrace the idea that the Kingdom of God in all of it’s fullness is going to be one continuous “all day dinner on the grounds.””
    You are in the great majority but I’m convinced this view has far more to with carry over from Medieval eschatology. Second Temple Judaism of Jesus day saw a restoration of the people and the land to what God intended in the Torah when the Messiah returned. Jesus use the very idea of jubilee (Luke 4) to announce the significance of his arrival. Central to that notion is that those in indebted servitude and those who have lost their land would have their labor and land restored to them so they could once again become freely producing and contributing members of the community. When we strip of Western lenses and see it through first century eyes, see a restoration of people to the land to work it not a release from it.
    I’d also add this. Relationship does not require a material existence. If it is all about relationship, then why would God create us as material beings. The answers are there in Genesis. He created the earth and placed us in dominion over it. Is that a temporary irrelevant mission that God gave us or is central to our very purpose that needs to be redeemed and restored. I would argue strongly that it is the latter.

  14. I really found this interesting. Creation care is something that I am thrilled to see emerging in the church in a non-politicized way — presented in a biblical framework. I’m still improving on all of my efforts to go green, but I know I’ve gotten better.
    In the midst of the global recession, I’m having a harder time financially. As a really practical person, I’ve been trying to find ways to save money, but I couldn’t really find anything that matched my desire to do it in an environmentally friendly, faith-based way.
    I’m looking forward to a book coming out on April 1 by Nancy Sleeth. It’s called, Go Green Save Green. Her husband wrote another book, Serve God Save the Planet, which is what actually got me started on these efforts.
    The website says Nancy’s book has “Hundreds of simple, easy-to-implement money-saving tips for going green at home and at the office.” I found it at http://www.gogreenthebook.com, so I’m trying to tell everyone about it. Her husband’s book really changed my life.
    I’ll be checking your blog again. Your thoughts are in line with mine, for sure.

  15. Thanks for the link and the testimony. I keep an eye out for the book.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading