Is Consumerism the Real Quesiton?

Consumerism. Everywhere I turn, I confront articles, blog posts, and books reflecting on the evils of consumerism. There is concern that consumerism has overtaken the church. A cottage industry now exists to address these issues, offering resources and seminars for your … well … consumption. So what, exactly, is consumerism?

Wikipedia says, “Consumerism is the equation of personal happiness with consumption and purchasing material possessions.” That is about as good as any definition. In the church context, it centers on people shopping for churches that meet their “needs” and churches marketing products and programs tailored to meet “customer” needs. I think most of us could give an example we would call consumerism. But there is something not quite right here.

Consumption is a verb. Verbs need a subject and an object. The subject is a consumer … me, for instance. But what is the object? “Things?” I can’t recall ever having had the urge to buy a “thing.” The target of my urge is something specific … a top-of-the-line home theater system or front-row seats at the ball game. Happiness does not come from the consumption of generic things but rather from the perceived need that specific things satisfy in our inner world. Those things produce something for us.

We learn that we are world builders when we look at the biblical narrative. We were made in God’s image. As his image-bearers, we create physical and cultural worlds. We were given dominion … made vice-regents over creation. But we were created to live our world-building calling in relationship to God.

With the fall comes the disruption of relationship and the world-building project for which we were made. Adam and Eve are cast from the garden, and things quickly go downhill. Cain kills his brother. He is banished from the presence of God. Then Genesis 4:16-17 records these words:

Then Cain went away from the presence of the Lord, and settled in the land of Nod, east of Eden. Cain knew his wife, and she conceived and bore Enoch; and he built a city, and named it Enoch after his son Enoch.

The two primary social institutions in ancient cultures were kinship and politics. Cain starts a lineage and establishes a city. He names his son and the city Enoch, meaning “initiated.” Cain initiates the building of a new world apart from God. This is an attempt to give meaning and purpose to his life. But note where Cain builds the city: Nod. “Nod” means “wandering.” Cain has “settled” in the land of “wandering!” An exercise in futility if ever there was one, but Cain’s project is now the prototypical human project … building a world in the land of wandering.

Ancient societies built their worlds around kinship and politics. Kinship and politics aren’t evil. They were redirected toward his project of building a world apart from God. Ancient cultures tended to be totalitarian world-building projects infused with divine qualities. We have entered a different time. World-building projects are more individualized. Rather than building one world through domination, we cooperatively engage each other in exchange to create our customized worlds with their own customized deities.

There is nothing inherently wrong with consumption. Every living thing on the planet consumes. There is nothing wrong with seeing to our needs. God created a world of abundance but made us participants in our provision as we “till the garden.” There is nothing wrong with taking delight in material pleasures. We are material beings who create things, and it is appropriate that the material items we form bring us happiness. There is nothing wrong with exchange. Exchange gives us access to things that can enhance our lives that we otherwise would not have.

Corruption enters the picture through the values by which we approach consumption, meeting needs, experiencing happiness, and exchange. Those values emanate from the world-building projects that have formed in our minds. This means that any given act of consumption can be legitimate for one person and idolatry for another. Reshape the world-building projects, and you reshape the values through which all else is done.

Enter the Kingdom of God with its new (or is it the original?) vision of a world-building community … a place where consumption, meeting needs, experiencing happiness, and exchange are redirected to their intended place in the order of things. How do we participate in, and invite others into, the original world-building project? It seems to me that this is the question.


Comments

5 responses to “Is Consumerism the Real Quesiton?”

  1. Brilliant!

  2. Yeah, you’re buying the sizzle, not (just) the steak. And consumption of material objects, like sex or hunger or family or patriotism or whatever, are ultimately good when subordinated to love for God.
    But this is like saying all sins boil down to idolatry. It’s true and insightful, but it’s still helpful to recognize different kinds of sins. It’s helpful to recognize gluttony (to use an older term) for the problem it is, even if the real problem is dissatisfaction that comes from not having the love of God central in one’s life.

  3. Virgil
    Thanks … now buy a bottle of Guinness.
    Travis
    Good points. Maybe we need to get back to the seven deadly sins.
    “Consumerism” just doesn’t elucidate much for me. I think any of the following could be attributed to what most are calling consumerism.
    With conspicuous consumption we are really talking about envy and pride.
    With someone who enjoys the power of buying whatever they want we are talking about greed and lust.
    With someone who can’t seem to control their appetite for certain things we are talking about gluttony.
    With someone who won’t do the necessary work to bring wholeness to his life and instead tries to buy it via other means we are talking about sloth.
    I hear people sometimes say that they know something is true because the looked it up on the internet. It maybe true but it is utterly uninformative. What site? What source?
    Similarly to say that a person met a need through consumption tells me nothing. What did they consume? Why did they consume it? Only then can we talk about a response.

  4. How about “(over)consumption is the vice that corresponds to the virtue of simplicity”?

  5. In Celebration of Simplicity, Richard Foster uses one of my favorite analogies. Imagine someone drops a length of thread, several inches long, on the table in front of you. You are instructed to position the thread into a perfectly straight line. Using your fingers you push and pull the thread all over the place but, try all you want, you aren’t going to get it into a straight line. But if you take your index finger and place it on one end of the string and then draw it across the table … guess what? The string forms into a perfectly straight line.
    There are endless urges, needs, and demands pressing on us at all the times. If we focus our attention on endlessly pushing and pulling the thread of desires into line we will experience futility. Foster says simplicity is not about a quantity of possesssions. Rather simplicity is singleness of focus … focus on God. Focus on God is putting the finger on the string that pulls everything else into line.
    Imagine a guy on diet with a real weakness for hot fudge sundaes. He knells by his bed to pray at night. “Lord you know I need to lose weight but you also know my weakness for hot fudge sundaes. So Lord, please deliver me from hot fudge sundaes, because if I can’t stop eating hot fudge sundaes I’ll never get healthy. Those hot fudge sundaes are my biggest obstacle but I know you can deliver me. You have said you Lord over everything, even hot fudge sundaes, so I put my faith in you. Amen.” So now what is the one thing on this guy’s mind? Hot fudge sundaes!
    Instead, our prayer should be something more like, “Lord I know you welcome me as your son. I want to become more like you. Transform my heart and mind. Make me into the person you would have me be. You are my all in all. My hope is in you. You are king of kings and Lord of Lords. You are the one who is closer to me than a brother. I worship you and I give all honor, glory and praise to you. Amen.” No what is on this guy’s mind. God. You give power to whatever you focus on … that is what comes to define you.
    With both conspicuous consumption and simple lifestyles, there is no objective standard. Almost no one who is conspicuously consuming believes that is what they are doing and almost everyone who is living simply could always live simpler. It’s not that the issues shouldn’t be talked about but organizing our lives around these issues is like praying to be released from hot fudge sundaes. Consuming or not consuming comes to define us, not God and his Kingdom.
    Cleaning out the demon of consumerism merely empties the soul for a demon to rush in … say, pride over conspicuous non-consumption. 🙂 It’s better that we fill up with God and crowd out the demons.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading