Kruse Kronicle

Global Warming With the Lid Off

—

by

mwkruse
in ,

Wall Street Journal: Global Warming With the Lid Off

The emails that reveal an effort to hide the truth about climate science.

… However, we do now have hundreds of emails that give every appearance of testifying to concerted and coordinated efforts by leading climatologists to fit the data to their conclusions while attempting to silence and discredit their critics. In the department of inconvenient truths, this one surely deserves a closer look by the media, the U.S. Congress and other investigative bodies.

For an accompanying article with the text of some emails, Climate Science and Candor. So much for the objective apolitical presentation of the truth about climate change by the world's leading climate scientists.

Comments

4 responses to “Global Warming With the Lid Off”

  1. Naum Avatar
    Naum

    Swiftboating the Climate Scientists
    http://www.marklynas.org/2009/11/23/swiftboating-the-climate-scientists

    Reply
  2. Naum Avatar
    Naum

    The hacked climate science email scandal that wasn’t
    http://scienceblogs.com/islandofdoubt/2009/11/the_hacked_climate_science_ema.php

    Reply
  3. Michael W. Kruse Avatar
    Michael W. Kruse

    Thanks for the links Naum but the bottom line is that science is supposed to be collaborative effort where data is shared to the point that scientist can replicate and test each other’s work. Stonewalling FOI requests, deleting inconvenient files, misrepresenting facts, and isolating dissenters, is not science.
    The intensely tribal and secretive nature of the climate science community has long been casting doubt over the questions of climate change. If the case is slam dunk then open the files and give open access to data so the rest of the scientific community can test it. The questions are too important to be left to this type of political manipulation by these scientists.

    Reply
  4. Dave Avatar
    Dave

    The most likely not hacked but whistle blown climate “non-science”, or more accurately nonsense, that started the death of cap-and-trade.
    Naum, The real damning stuff in the package is the computer code. It is posted at Wattsupwiththat.com, but don’t go there for the commentary, look at the programs yourself if you can understand them.
    Mark Lynas says that it doesn’t matter because the data is replicated multiple places. Except that is does. This would put a couple of major climate scientists saying that the topic isn’t closed. It also happens to be the data that the IPCC based their report on.
    Finally, James Hansen (if you don’t know who he is then you haven’t really done enough research on this topic to have an informed opinion) has admitted to “adjusting” his numbers. He also won’t explain his justification. But it just so happens that his post 1980 numbers almost all adjusted up and the pre 1980 numbers almost all adjusted down.
    So we have at least 2 seperate sets of “climate scientists” with doctored data. This is akin to, I’d call it much worse than, plagiarism, which is grounds at almost every college for dismissal.
    This smacks of “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.”
    I misunderstood the AGW crowd. I thought they were saying that global warming was “man made”. It’s becoming obvious that what they were really saying is that is was “Mann made”.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading