No More Executive Bonuses!

Wall Street Journal: No More Executive Bonuses!

The problem isn't that they are poorly designed. The problem is that they exist.

These days, it seems, there is no shortage of recommendations for fixing the way bonuses are paid to executives at big public companies.

Well, I have my own recommendation: Scrap the whole thing. Don't pay any bonuses. Nothing. …

… People pursue the job of chief executive for all kinds of reasons: the prestige of the position, the sheer pleasure of heading up a major company, the chance to make a real difference to an institution they cherish, and, of course, remuneration. When push comes to shove, do you think pay is more consequential to these people than the other factors? All this compensation madness is not about markets or talents or incentives, but rather about insiders hijacking established institutions for their personal benefit.

Too many large corporations today are starved for leadership—true leadership, meaning engaged leadership embedded in concerned management. And the global economy desperately needs renewed enterprise, embedded in the belief that companies are communities. Getting rid of executive bonuses, and the gambling games that accompany them, is the place to start.

I don't know if I'm fully persuaded, but he makes some excellent points.


Comments

2 responses to “No More Executive Bonuses!”

  1. I don’t want to sound like I am peddling class warfare but I agree with the writer on this issue. Something is out of control crazy in too many corporations with aloof CEO’s making obscene amounts of money for, really, who knows what?? How shareholders can think that this is good for business and their company’s reputation is beyond me. It’s high time that those at the top of the hill start rolling up their sleeves, engaging their employees, and become sensible about their compensation and the message that it sends.

  2. I know one theory is the tournament model. Just as in a golf tournament or NASCAR race, the guy who comes out on top gets a big payoff for having won. The opportunity to earn that payoff is what motivates everyone else to do their best. Thus you get a whole group of folks motivated to excel even thought only one wins. I’m not persuaded by that model either but there is a method to the madness. Frankly, I don’t know enough about this area to have definitive take. I just know that the appearances are not good.

Leave a Reply to ChuckCancel reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading