Relic reveals Noah’s ark was circular

Guardian: Relic reveals Noah's ark was circular

That they processed aboard the enormous floating wildlife collection two-by-two is well known. Less familiar, however, is the possibility that the animals Noah shepherded on to his ark then went round and round inside.

According to newly translated instructions inscribed in ancient Babylonian on a clay tablet telling the story of the ark, the vessel that saved one virtuous man, his family and the animals from god's watery wrath was not the pointy-prowed craft of popular imagination but rather a giant circular reed raft.

The now battered tablet, aged about 3,700 years, was found somewhere in the Middle East by Leonard Simmons, a largely self-educated Londoner who indulged his passion for history while serving in the RAF from 1945 to 1948.

The relic was passed to his son Douglas, who took it to one of the few people in the world who could read it as easily as the back of a cornflakes box; he gave it to Irving Finkel, a British Museum expert, who translated its 60 lines of neat cuneiform script.

There are dozens of ancient tablets that have been found which describe the flood story but Finkel says this one is the first to describe the vessel's shape.

"In all the images ever made people assumed the ark was, in effect, an ocean-going boat, with a pointed stem and stern for riding the waves – so that is how they portrayed it," said Finkel. "But the ark didn't have to go anywhere, it just had to float, and the instructions are for a type of craft which they knew very well. It's still sometimes used in Iran and Iraq today, a type of round coracle which they would have known exactly how to use to transport animals across a river or floods."

Finkel's research throws light on the familiar Mesopotamian story, which became the account in Genesis, in the Old Testament, of Noah and the ark that saved his menagerie from the waters which drowned every other living thing on earth. …


Comments

9 responses to “Relic reveals Noah’s ark was circular”

  1. That’s a fascinating idea — but I like what the rabbis say: that it was a submarine, because the flood was actually a removal of the firmament separating the waters above (shamayim) from the waters below (mayim). I actually just finished a papercut based on an even more random idea about the construction of the ark…

  2. Intresting.
    How can we be sure that the biblical authors used the mesopotamian story as the basis for theirs?
    And if they did, what theological point were they trying to make by co-opting the story?

  3. My take is that I’m not sure it matters where the story originated. Ancient Near East people communicated truths through stories. The stories may or may not have connection to actual historical occurrences.
    God communicates into specific cultures to specific peoples, using their means of communicating truth. The ANE practice was to take from their “stock of stories” and add and or revise elements to communicate the truth as they understood it. Thus, it is makes sense that inspired biblical writers would have taken the stories of the culture around them and reshaped the stories to communicate the truth God was revealing to them.

  4. There may have been some historical referent for the flood narrative, since every culture seems to have one. Or (my own view, although I agree it probably doesn’t matter) the flood represents some kind of primal fear, since the sea was identified with chaos. Notice the lack of sea in Revelation’s new Jerusalem.
    Particularly for the ancients, removal of the stability of land in a flood would have been about the most terrifying thing imaginable. I find it terrifying myself.
    It’s a story about God’s judgment, but also about his preservation of a righteous remnant, a theme that is picked up in Scripture again and again.

  5. I resonate with your understanding, Travis. What I’m fuzzy on is what role the flood stories played in the narratives in these other cultures. (No time to get out the ole textbooks just now.) Sometimes much is learned about God’s revelation by seeing the biblical stories in contrast with other versions.

  6. So you discount the biblical narrative where specific length and width measurements are given?

  7. Not sure what you mean by discount. Clearly they are there and part of the story.

  8. ======================
    When the Bible has specific dimensions for the ark and Irving Finkel says something as dumb as:
    “There are dozens of ancient tablets that have been found which describe the flood story but Finkel says this one is THE FIRST to describe the vessel’s shape.”
    you’ve got to question this guys ability to research and make sound judgement.
    ======================

  9. Genesis 6
    “… 14 Make yourself an ark of gopher wood. [4] Make rooms in the ark, and cover it inside and out with pitch. 15 This is how you are to make it: the length of the ark 300 cubits, [5] its breadth 50 cubits, and its height 30 cubits. 16 Make a roof [6] for the ark, and finish it to a cubit above, and set the door of the ark in its side. Make it with lower, second, and third decks.”
    This is all the passage says. Was it rectangular. Was 50 cubits wide at the middle tapering toward the bow and stern? Other configurations are possible. The measurements give some since of area but not shape.

Leave a Reply to Isaac B2Cancel reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading