Wierdo Capitalism

Daily Nebraskan: ‘F’ing weirdo capitalists’ ruin market for everybody (HT: Victor Claar)

… Historically speaking, capitalism has proven itself time after time to be the most viable system for generating wealth. If you can study 20th century history and not end up a capitalist in some sense, I don’t know what to do with you.

Yet because of a few “f’ing weirdo” capitalists, the system itself has understandably fallen into question with many. When such skeptics hear “capitalist” they conjure images of men like Ken Lay or Jeff Skilling, former Enron execs who bled their workers dry in order to preserve their own wealth. Or they think of a man like Bernie Madoff, who conned countless people out of millions before finally being caught last year.

Thinking more historically, they might imagine the slave holders of the United States and Great Britain or the colonizers of Africa, all groups that used capitalism to justify their horrific actions.

Yet before these men were capitalists, they were something else: greedy, self-absorbed fiends whose sole objective in life was to satisfy every hedonistic whim with no regard for the good of other people. And in a few cases, you can add to that self-centered hedonism a heaping helping of religious arrogance. Such attitudes are, needless to say, a recipe for disaster, which do to capitalism what men like this week’s street preacher and Osama bin Laden do to Christianity and Islam, respectively.

Capitalism in conversation with an external moral code regulating it is not an evil system. What is evil is capitalism in a vacuum, devoid of any external guidance. In short, consumerism – the sort of capitalism exemplified by Lay, Skilling and Madoff.

So I call myself a capitalist with a seat belt. It’s more imaginative than “compassionate conservative” and eschews the baggage inherent in the term thanks to its main proponent, former President George W. Bush, whose policies were neither. …

Not sure I would agree with the author at every point, but it is an interesting perspective.


Comments

3 responses to “Wierdo Capitalism”

  1. I appreciate the distinction the author makes between capitalism and consumerism.

  2. Me too. I’ve argued elsewhere that a market economy is largely an amoral piece of technology. It amplifies whatever values are fed into it and facilitates choices. Garbage in, garbage out. Consumerism is a value system fed into the market/capitalist economy. While capitalism is essential to consumerism, consumerism is not essential to capitalism.

  3. D G Bokare Avatar
    D G Bokare

    Capitalism is today known for exploitation. Its sole intention is to make profits at any costs. This intention is designed by a few elite people with cooperation of some politicians on quid pro quo basis for self growth instead of growth of the mankind in general. If capitalism is designed on the basis of production for living instead of profits, it would have been a different and happy civilization.This was visualized by Mahatma Gandhi almost one hundred years ago. Today the capitalist economic system is on the verge of collapse because of main objective to make profits by few at the cost of others. This would create more Enrons in the world.

Leave a Reply to Josh RowleyCancel reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading