And man made life

Economist: And man made life

Artificial life, the stuff of dreams and nightmares, has arrived.

TO CREATE life is the prerogative of gods. Deep in the human psyche, whatever the rational pleadings of physics and chemistry, there exists a sense that biology is different, is more than just the sum of atoms moving about and reacting with one another, is somehow infused with a divine spark, a vital essence. It may come as a shock, then, that mere mortals have now made artificial life.

Craig Venter and Hamilton Smith, the two American biologists who unravelled the first DNA sequence of a living organism (a bacterium) in 1995, have made a bacterium that has an artificial genome—creating a living creature with no ancestor (see article). Pedants may quibble that only the DNA of the new beast was actually manufactured in a laboratory; the researchers had to use the shell of an existing bug to get that DNA to do its stuff. Nevertheless, a Rubicon has been crossed. It is now possible to conceive of a world in which new bacteria (and eventually, new animals and plants) are designed on a computer and then grown to order.

That ability would prove mankind’s mastery over nature in a way more profound than even the detonation of the first atomic bomb. The bomb, however justified in the context of the second world war, was purely destructive. Biology is about nurturing and growth. Synthetic biology, as the technology that this and myriad less eye-catching advances are ushering in has been dubbed, promises much. In the short term it promises better drugs, less thirsty crops (see article), greener fuels and even a rejuvenated chemical industry. In the longer term who knows what marvels could be designed and grown?

On the face of it, then, artificial life looks like a wonderful thing. Yet that is not how many will view the announcement. For them, a better word than “creation” is “tampering”. Have scientists got too big for their boots? Will their hubris bring Nemesis in due course? What horrors will come creeping out of the flask on the laboratory bench? …


Comments

5 responses to “And man made life”

  1. Count me among the pedants. This is a big deal, but it isn’t quite “synthetic life”.

  2. I think I’m more with you. It does pose interesting questions.

  3. Dana Ames Avatar
    Dana Ames

    One commenter I read said it’s a bunch of fancy copying and pasting.
    Dana

  4. It is indeed copying and pasting. Creating a cell, even a bacterial one de novo is still a very long way off. Still, it is exciting, and frightening. Our existing rules, laws, and norms do not even begin to comprehend what is about to happen and that’s usually a good recipe for disaster…

  5. It does change the way one thinks about the future. We’re somewhat comfortable, judging by our fiction, with the idea of robots that clean up oil spills, say. The idea of some genetically engineered duck that eats oil is a little more disturbing. Will our future look more like the Flintstones, with different engineered animals doing the work that machines do now?

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading