What Constantine had Right

Richard Mouw: What Constantine had Right

… All of that is good and important. The problem, though, is that sometimes the folks who make much of the dangers of Constantinianism and Christendom are placing too strict limits on how Christians can relate to public life. This was made clear to me in a conversation with someone who thought that my own views were dangerously close to Constantinianism. I pushed the person to explain why he interpreted my perspective in that manner. His response came in the form of two questions: Do I think that Christians can work effectively for Christian goals “within the American political system.” And do I believe that Christians can not only endorse the use of violence in law enforcement and military campaigns, but actually themselves serve as police and members of the military?

I responded to both questions in the affirmative, but also with the necessary qualifications. I believe that there are limits to the kinds of political compromises that a Christians can agree to. And I also believe that police action and military campaigns must be conducted within the kind of moral framework associated with “just war doctrine.” The person’s response was an “Aha! So you admit it. You really are a Constantinian!”

Actually, I do think Constantine had something right. And here I take an important clue from Lesslie Newbigin. …


Comments

One response to “What Constantine had Right”

  1. Dana Ames Avatar
    Dana Ames

    It bugs me when people make sweeping generalizations about ancient folks when they don’t actually read the historical sources. That may be just a wee a bit anachronistic…
    Here’s some more information, probably better information than the ideas about “Constantinianism” floating around among US Christians:
    http://www.johnsanidopoulos.com/2010/05/constantine-great-and-historical-truth.html
    Dana

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading