Newsweek: Don't Fence Them In

The Arizona of the future won’t suffer from too many immigrants—but from too few.

… Yet all this angst may be an over-reaction. A little-known, but enormously significant, demographic development has been unfolding south of our border. The fertility rate in Mexico—whose emigrants account for a majority of the United States’ undocumented population—has undergone one of the steepest declines in history, from about 6.7 children per woman in 1970 to about 2.1 today, according to World Bank figures. That makes it roughly equal to the U.S. rate and puts it at what demographers call “replacement level,” the point at which women are having just enough babies to sustain the current population. In coming years it’s expected to dip even further. Other countries in Latin America have experienced a similar drop, though not as sharp. All of which means that the ranks of those “invading” hordes are thinning—rapidly.

The flow of undocumented immigrants began to taper in the middle of the past decade. According to the Pew Hispanic Center, the influx averaged 800,000 per year from 2000 to 2004, then dropped to about 500,000 per year from 2005 to 2008. It has almost certainly decreased even more since then, as the Great Recession has wiped out demand for foreign labor. People think of the torrent of illegal immigration in the recent past, and “it scares the pants off them,” says Dowell Myers, a professor in the School of Policy, Planning, and Development at the University of Southern California. But “the [demographic] trends that were driving changes in the last decade won’t be there in the next decade.”

Mexico’s fertility rate has plummeted for a variety of reasons. Starting in the 1970s, its government undertook one of the most aggressive contraception campaigns in Latin America and set up family-planning clinics across the country. Women also received better schooling, and as Mexico continued to urbanize and industrialize they entered the workforce in much higher numbers. The result was more economic opportunity, greater control over their lives—and fewer babies.

When women start having fewer kids, that means fewer individuals will be entering the labor force two decades later. It has taken longer for that effect to appear in Mexico, however, because even though the fertility rate began falling in the late 1970s, the number of women of childbearing age kept growing. As a result, the pool of newly minted Mexican workers has continued to swell through today. But that’s about to change. As soon as next year, demographers say, the number of new entrants into the Mexican labor force is expected to start decreasing. This year that figure is about 750,000, says Félix Vélez, secretary-general of Mexico’s National Population Council. By 2020 it’s expected to drop to 600,000, and by 2030 to 300,000. …

In short, Mexico, like many other emerging nations, Mexico is heading down the home stretch of the Demographic Transition. But completing that transition is probably still a decade or more away. Ease on the pressure of people to leave Mexico still doesn't resolve the illegal immigration problem. Illegal immigration, not Mexico, is the problem, and we still need comprehensive reform.


Comments

8 responses to “Don’t Fence Them In”

  1. Interesting, wasn’t aware of that demographic angle. Though to put the matter another way, the US still needs to decide (and fairly quickly) what the ultimate purpose and objectives behind its immigration policy will be.

  2. Michael, the newsweek artical really got it wrong. There are bigger problems with the soft sounthern border than the illegal Mexican labor and those looking to find jobs in america.
    1) What about those seeking to get into the US to do us harm ?
    2) The extremly high cost to provide services to the illegals…medical, other health issues, high visible crimes, housing, Fed Govt and State Services, schools etc…
    3) Most new illegals refuse to intergrate into the larger American Culture and to even learn our language.
    4) Those who came to this country just prior to World War II and after were pround to become ” Americans” not the case anymore.
    5) The issue will not solve its self because of population changes ! Is newsweek kidding, who in their right mind would believe such a story.
    6) Ugh ! I’m so tired of why folks don’t get the idea that the name suggests “Illegal” is just that. We need to enforce our laws and mexico needs to do their part to enforce the border as well. Somtimes I wonder where all the common sense has gone.
    Guess this isn’t very Gracious of me is it? But we do need to do somthing to guard our borders.

  3. 1) Those seeking to get into the US to do us harm have not come by way of Mexico.
    2) This is an issue…but if we documented them we could collect income tax to cover all this. As it stands, they still provide a net gain to the economy.
    3) You could say the same exact thing about the first generation of every immigrant group ever.
    4) I doubt you have any data to show that.
    5) The problem is primarily economic. There are jobs here and not there. Less people there = more jobs = less pressure to cross an arbitrary line in the sand.
    6) The law matters. But the law is for us, not we for it. We can change it if it’s no longer working. It’s no longer working. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t enforce the law while we address the problems with the law, but it does no good to simply cross our arms and say “well, it’s the law”, as if it were handed down by God and can’t be changed.

  4. Like some of the other times Travis I can’t always agree with you on every point. Not sure about your repsonce to point number 3. Of course my data is anecdotal. My grand parents came from Italy in the late 30’s and they along with all their friends (many) wanted so bad to speak English and intergrate into the Culture they refused to speak in their native language unless really necessary. I believe this was more the norm at that time period. They were proud to become American…
    Not sure you understand the danger of a soft border either, no matter where it is today.
    Yes the law matters and should be enforced now by all until those in Congess can manage to come up with somthing that makes sense out all this border stuff.
    I’m not sure those in control in DC are really up to the task Travis. We live in a dangerous world and the soft borders are just one aspect. But I agree with you that we really do need to address it.

  5. I share your pessimism about helpful law on immigration coming out of Washington, but I think the cause is that there is so much fear and unreason on this topic. Coupled with that, I believe, is a misunderstanding of history. I would again argue that, your grandparents notwithstanding, all immigrant groups take a generation or two to assimilate. Immigrant waves from the past, whether from Scandinavia, Ireland, southern Europe, Asia, the Caribbean, or wherever, tended at first to band together in neighborhoods, frequently maintaining native customs and language (including native-language newspapers). Hence most major cities having a “Chinatown” or a “Little Italy”, etc. The perception that the most recent wave of immigration is somehow different is, I believe, not based on facts.
    As for the soft border…well, I think it is like the lock on your house. You are not really going to keep somebody out who wants in, but you can make it not worth their trouble. Anything we do to strengthen the border has to be seen the same way, not as some kind of cure-all that will finally “make us safe”.

  6. Good points Travis. By the way they were my Great grand parents.
    Yes I agree too with your example about the lock. Our Safety really comes from God, but we should make it not worth the trouble for those who would break our Laws.
    By the way, whatever reform takes place it should include those in proper authority in Mexico working with us to accomoplish this. Thats probably not going to happen though.

  7. David and Travis,
    Good conversation. I would add a few things:
    1. There is an economic behind this which often is not heard between the security and cultural issues. There are interests that favor current arrangements of cheaper labor requiring fewer benefits. The glacial pace of immigration change has alot to do with maintaining that status quo. We have never really created space for a genuine discussion of economic vs. cultural benefits and liabilities of immigration.
    2. Illegal workers do indeed get payroll taxes taken out in many cases. I’ve even heard of some workers getting social security cards without checking status for the express purpose of extracting tax money from them. The IRS wants to get paid.
    3. I agree that immigrant assimilation/acculturation into any host society is a graduat negotiation. It never happens over night. Here in Chicago, if you look at books highlighting our cities history as a immigrant haven, there are pictures taken pre WWII of railway stations and social service centers with signs in at least 5 or 6 different European languages alone.
    4. The biggest danger on the Southern Border is not so much terrorism of the global variety, but simply and tragically the drug war in Mexico moving over the border. Cleaning that mess up will take more than just wall and troops. Again, when economics (even black market) is involved, things get tricky.

  8. Good point about the status quo. There are people and groups whose interest is served by having a readily available but easily removed underclass of migrant workers.
    Yes, the drug wars are the real problem with that border. Unfortunately, our insatiable demand for drugs is what fuels that fire.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading