New York Times: How Puritans Turned Capitalist

You certainly won’t find the Rev. Samuel Willard on the list of founding fathers, but his role in shaping the nation was considerable, according to ”Heavenly Merchandize,” a new book by Mark Valeri, professor of church history at Union Theological Seminary in Richmond, Va. Mr. Valeri’s book, subtitled “How Religion Shaped Commerce in Puritan America,” explains how a series of catastrophes in the mid-17th century turned Puritan preachers like Mr. Willard from disdain for the market to praise for it as morally necessary, for economic growth and hence the social order:

Puritanbook-ideas-blogSmallInline [He] preached during a period when Boston merchants believed that their occupation was essential to the commonweal — to England’s prosperity and therefore to Protestantism and liberty. Their strategies to convey goods, credit, and power throughout the British Atlantic proved them to be patrons of the empire. Many moralists, Willard included, valorized them in such terms. His successors, leading Boston pastors of the 1710s, 1720s, and 1730s, went further. They, along with their parishioners, sanctioned the practices that guaranteed economic success as moral mandates, and the rules that governed commercial exchange as natural and divine laws. Their convictions informed a market culture that, by many accounts, came to maturity by 1750 and provided motives for rebellion against the British Empire after the cessation of war with France. ["Heavenly Merchandize" (introduction); author interview, The Boston Globe]


Comments

One response to “How Puritans Turned Capitalist”

  1. Looks like one to add to the reading list once I finish a writing assignment.
    Valeri makes this comment in the online comments sections after the article:
    Not to be misunderstood, I attempt to show in this book how different were the religious sensibilities of the early Puritans–those fastened on local needs and scriptural admonitions–from the sort represented by Willard. Ironies abound. This is a critique of Weber, in a sense, and an attempt to disengage early Calvinism from its later iterations. Yet the larger point is this: religious ideas shaped commercial (too early to call them capitalist) mores.

Leave a Reply to ceemacCancel reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading