Too much choice leaving us bewildered and depressed

Telegraph: Too much choice leaving us bewildered and depressed

Modern life is making us miserable because we have too much choice, claims new research.

From the foods we eat, to the television channels we watch, to the schools we send our children too and the career we choose to pursue, society has never offered us so much variety.

But while the ability to choose is generally a good thing, too much freedom of choice is crippling us with indecision and making us unhappy, claims the new research.

People can become paralysed by too much variety and wracked with uncertainty and regret about whether they have made the right decision.

Ultimately they can be less satisfied by the choices they have made.

The study believes that the problem is that when you have too much choice, you become obsessed about what your decision will say about you.

Then when you have made the choice you worry that it is wrong.

Choice can also foster selfishness and a lack of empathy because it can focus people on their own preferences and on themselves at the expense of what is good for society as a whole.

Professor Hazel Rose Markus, the author from Stanford University's Department of Psychology, said: "We cannot assume that choice, as understood by educated, affluent Westerners, is a universal aspiration, and that the provision of choice will necessarily foster freedom and well-being.

"Even in contexts where choice can foster freedom, empowerment, and independence, it is not an unalloyed good. Choice can also produce a numbing uncertainty, depression, and selfishness."

The authors looked at a body of research into the cultural ideas surrounding choice.

They found that among non-Western cultures and among working-class Westerners, freedom and choice are less important or mean something different than they do for the university-educated people. …


Comments

8 responses to “Too much choice leaving us bewildered and depressed”

  1. Huh.
    Who knew that the happiest people of all were the Soviet citizens?

  2. LOL. Bring on the bread lines! 🙂 It is interesting that while we decry choice few would “choose” to return to a previous era.
    I do think that our brains and cultures over the generations have not developed the mechanisms to process so much chioce. I think that may be part of the challenge.

  3. Typical British nonsense. I don’t think we’re quite at the point of Buriden’s ass. Even if we have to choose between 14 different cell-phone plans.
    (British papers seem to have no concept of “paragraph”. Or maybe they think their readers don’t.)
    Good grief. It isn’t British nonsense – it’s Stanford nonsense.
    If Markus is right (and it’s probable that this research is being gobbled up in the Halls of Power), the logical conclusion is that in order to increase the Coefficient of Happiness in the People, we’ll just have to limit their choices. Why should they have to choose between a hundred different news sources, when one – generously guided by the elite – would suffice? After all, if it rains in New York on Tuesday, it rains – you don’t need a hundred different voices telling you that. And who needs 50 different kinds of car, when one – generously provided by the government – would suffice? And one kind of truck, for carrying things around to the one GUM?
    Life would be so much simpler, so much closer to Rosseau’s ideal, if only those pesky, confusing choices went away.
    “I do think that our brains and cultures over the generations have not developed the mechanisms to process so much choice.”
    Brains don’t develop over generations to enable choice. Brains develop between 5 or 6 and 25 or 26. The successful executive is the guy who makes the right choices most often. Same for the successful general, the successful investor.
    Optimum choice among alternatives is a learned thing – partly inherited, partly learned.
    I do admit to seeing people spend 5 or 10 minutes looking at the menu at a fast-food emporium. Not everyone has spent those 10,000 hours on practicing making choices.

  4. My point would be that our brains do literally alter the connections to facilitate repetitive behavior. Expansion of choice in one of two areas of life is not particularly troublesome but when every task ceases to be a matter of habit or limited choice it involves more conscious decision. I don’t think as a culture we have developed the norms and patterns of behavior that promote ease and satisfaction with choosing so often. It is one of the by-products of the rapid increase in affluence in recent years. I don’t think the answer has to be offering people less choice. Another answer is to develop strategies for weighing choices. That is something I think the church could be doing.

  5. vanskaamper Avatar
    vanskaamper

    I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it.
    Thomas Jefferson

  6. Not sure liberty and choice are synonyms. But even if taken as such, there are still “inconveniences.” I don’t see what purpose it serves to act as though they don’t exist just because the alternative might be worse.
    An existence where people are bombarded with expansive choices in even the most inconsequential aspects of life is unique in human history. Just as we know technological innovations tend to solve some problems while eventually giving rise to new ones, we now that even positive cultural changes can lead to unanticipated problems in the future. That doesn’t mean we go backward but it also doesn’t mean the problem isn’t real.

  7. “… brains do literally alter the connections to facilitate repetitive behavior.”
    No question. Even something as complicated and potentially deadly as driving is done mostly subconsciously.
    You may be right about too much choice. On the other hand, watch a commercial TV channel for an entire day.
    “Another answer is to develop strategies for weighing choices.”
    I think we can call that “learning critical thinking”.
    “That is something I think the church could be doing.”
    In areas other than religion on theology?

  8. Interesting discussion. The issue of Choice has been studied and restudied. It’s clear too much choice results in confusion and uncertanity at best. Try chosing a good value in autos these days…Remember the days of Ford, and the other two govt owned auto companies?..
    Michael I think you nailed this one. We need not only strategies for weighing choice but we need an overall perspective, maybe call it life view, or even guiding principles in how we make choices that affect our living. Not so much weather you get a big Mac or Hardees, but is this what I want to put into my body? Maybe a bad example but I think you may understand what I mean.
    Doing one thing very well is most times better than doing many things…well, not so good.

Leave a Reply to Michael KruseCancel reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading