Neither a porn borrower nor a lender be

Boston.com: Neither a porn borrower nor a lender be  Jonah Goldberg

Of course you’ve heard some version of this tale before. Winston Churchill says to a woman at a party, “Madam, would you sleep with me for 5 million pounds?”

The woman stammers: “My goodness, Mr. Churchill. Well, yes, I suppose …”

Churchill interrupts: “Would you sleep with me for five pounds?”

The woman responds immediately: “What? Of course not! What kind of woman do you think I am?!”

To which the British bulldog replied: “Madam, we’ve already established that. Now we are haggling about the price.”

The story comes to mind upon hearing the news that the New York Public Library has gotten into the porn business. “With adults, anything that you can get on the Internet, you can legally get on a computer in the library,” explained an official. “It’s difficult, but we err on the side of free and open access.”

What does this have to do with the Churchill story? Well, imagine you went to your local library in, say, 1989 — or some other year before Al Gore invented the Internet. …

… The marginal cost of obtaining pornographic materials in libraries, once prohibitively high, is now nearly nonexistent [due to the internet]. In fact, it’s actually cheaper just to let it all flood in. Who wants to deal with the filters, blockers and monitors? Just proclaim that the First Amendment requires unfettered access to porn.

But, again, just imagine there was no Internet, and all two-dimensional smut was still on paper, celluloid or magnetic tape. Now imagine trying to argue before a cash-strapped city council that the public library must not only provide some porn — free of charge! — to the public, but that it must provide mountains of it free of charge to the public, all because the First Amendment says so. You’d be laughed out of the room.

Did the First Amendment change with the invention of the Internet? Of course not. What changed is that librarians lost both the “scarce resources” excuse and the backbone to invoke any other rationale — decency, child welfare, hygiene, safety, etc. — for barring it from public libraries.

Technological progress poses such challenges. Don’t get me wrong: I love technological progress. But technology makes life easier, and when life is easier, it’s harder to stick to the rules that were once essential to getting by in life. …


Comments

One response to “Neither a porn borrower nor a lender be”

  1. If you wanted to get a hold of porn before the days of the internet it was harder. You either had to A. be willing to drive somewhere and be willing to have your car be seen at ‘that place’ or be willing to be caught at the bookstore, etc. purchasing it (why do they sell porn at the Border’s in Olathe, KS anyway?) or B. you had to know people, who knew people like the drug trade.
    The ubiquitous nature of porn made possible via the internet has, in my opinion, contributed greatly to the softening of our cultural acceptance of porn as a mainstream reality. Not only that but it has resulted in the pornification of teen-aged girls and resulted in a really awful culture in which the sexually desirable woman is 18 or for some even younger. We are constantly barraged by 50 year old actors wedding 20 something actresses to ‘start a family’… give me a break, they aren’t interested in starting a family as much as the precursor to that event.
    If there is a proper place for the government to ‘regulate’ it needs to be in the interest of the public health, and this is a public health issue in my opnion.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading