Has Mission Become Our Idol?

Out of UR: Has Mission Become Our Idol? by Sky Jethani

The church and its leaders desperately need a vision of a life with God and not just for him.

… Is impact everything?

The students I meet with often worry about what awaits them after graduation. This is a reasonable concern for any young adult, but for many of them the worry extends far beyond finding a job with benefits. They fixate, and some obsess, about “making a difference in the world.” They fear living lives of insignificance. They worry about not achieving the right things, or not enough of the right things. Behind all of this is the belief that their value is determined by what they achieve. I’ve learned that when a student asks me, “What should I do with my life?” what he or she really wants to know is, “How can I prove that I am valuable?”

When we come believe that our faith is primarily about what we can do for God in the world, it is like throwing gasoline on our fear of insignificance. The resulting fire may be presented to others as a godly ambition, a holy desire to see God’s mission advance–the kind of drive evident in the Apostle Paul’s life. But when these flames are fueled by fear they reveal none of the peace, joy, or love displayed by Paul and rooted in the Spirit. Instead the relentless drive to prove our worth can quickly become destructive.

Sometimes the people who fear insignificance the most are driven to accomplish the greatest things. As a result they are highly praised within Christian communities for their good works. This temporarily soothes their fear until the next goal can be achieved. But there is a dark side to this drivenness. Gordon MacDonald calls it “missionalism.” It is “the belief that the worth of one’s life is determined by the achievement of a grand objective.” He continues:

Missionalism starts slowly and gains a foothold in the leader's attitude. Before long the mission controls almost everything: time, relationships, health, spiritual depth, ethics, and convictions. In advanced stages, missionalism means doing whatever it takes to solve the problem. In its worst iteration, the end always justifies the means. The family goes; health is sacrificed; integrity is jeopardized; God-connection is limited.

What I have witnessed in the lives of many college students is the early symptoms of missionalism. The virus had been introduced to them in childhood and incubated by well-intentioned churches, ministries, schools, and the wider evangelical subculture. And with graduation looming the students were feeling the pressure. It was after all their first opportunity to actually prove their worth through achievement.

When meeting with or counseling a struggling church leader, one of the questions I’ll ask to diagnose whether missionalism is present is this: “Assuming you’re not engaged in some kind of disqualifying sin, why not?” The answer I often hear, the answer most pastors have been conditioned to say, is: “I wouldn’t want to do anything to jeopardize my ministry.” That response often reveals where a leader’s true devotion is. Sadly I rarely hear a pastor say, “I wouldn’t want anything to disrupt my communion with God.” So few of us have been given a vision of a life with Christ, and instead we seek to fill the void with a vision for ministry–a vision of a life for Christ. …

Missionalism is exactly right. I think Jethani is on to something here.


Comments

7 responses to “Has Mission Become Our Idol?”

  1. Travis Greene Avatar
    Travis Greene

    Seeing one’s “achievement” or “impact” or whatever as a source of self-worth or validation is certainly a bad thing, but I don’t think this is an overfocus on mission but a too-narrow view of what mission includes, and Who is really doing it. But that’s still better than insular, Jesus-is-my-boyfriend individualism. Life with God means times of contemplation and Sabbath, absolutely, but also hard work, sacrifice, and suffering. Bifurcating “with” and “for” seems to me a mistake.

  2. The pastor at our church is incessantly challenging the congregation to go out and “make an impact.” Not a bad thing for sure but… I agree with Travis that we have to be careful about bifurcating “with” and “for.” Both have a place in the Christian’s life. However, it seems to me that any life of “impact” must be preceded and nourished with genuine relationship, fellowship, and communion with God; coming to know him. IMO this is where much of the evangelical church is all thumbs. Anybody can get busy, but it takes something more to enjoy intimacy.

  3. The church described in its various expressions in the New Testament always portrays three dimensions: doxological (God), koinonial (life within the Body of Christ) and missional (the mission of God). Such a “3-D” view offers balance to the church’s tendency through the ages to emphasize one of the three dimensions over the other two. Worship, the doxological focus, has been the primary emphasis of the church over the last half-a-century and missional is becoming the emphasis of our day. However, individually and corporately we are to live out all three dimensions of the church all the time.
    E. Stanley Ott

  4. Travis, note that he says,“…need a vision of a life with God and not JUST for him.” He isn’t setting them up as an either/or. His concern is the idolizing of missional. He didn’t we should not live for him but that doing that alone is idolatry. At the risk of hyperbole, I would call it heresy. Heresy is usually an important truth lifted up and out of relationship to other truths.
    We’ve had Christians in our culture who have made a fetish of the Sunday worship. They’ve had no sense of mission. It has often been quite narcissistic. They some could be said for too many smaller congregations where it is all about preservation of a warm fuzzy … and thoroughly inward focused … community.
    At it’s best, the missional movement has been a corrective to these idolatrous emphases. But at its worst, it is offering an equally destructive distortion. Stan, is exactly right. It is seeing the inseparable interrelationship between the doxological (worship), koinonial (fellowship), and missional (mission) in the body of Christ.
    On Monday I hope to post a piece that unpacks this a little more.
    Hope your summer is going well! Are you taking classes?

  5. Kevin Knox Avatar
    Kevin Knox

    I’ve been against “missional” since within a month of first hearing it, but arguing against it is exhausting. Missional has to have been invented to be distinctive in some way, but by the time it’s defenders are done it’s nothing more than being Christian – which is a great thing. Why can’t they just be satisfied with obeying the 2 great commandments?
    People who latch onto the word, “Missional,” are latching onto an active, aggressive, purposeful mindset and it changes the way they experience themselves. Plugging along at boring, old real life doesn’t feel very “missional.” You can be a humble Christian, reaching out a little, healing a little, praying a little. But if you’re Missional, it has to drive you.
    Christianity’s relationship to people boils down to “you are as valuable as I am – in every way,” and “connect to people.” Believe that, and you subvert everything in our culture. Saddling that impossible task with a goad like missionality seems a recipe for burnout.

  6. Travis Greene Avatar
    Travis Greene

    I agree there’s a balance, and that being “with” and “for” God are inter-related, or better, a virtuous circle. I also think ecclesiology is important here. Some are called to a more contemplative life, some to a more activist one.
    My summer is pretty good. No classes, but I’m doing an internship at a juvenile prison. It’s going pretty well. And we just had a baby (our first), so I’m not getting much sleep, but of course it’s worth it.

  7. JMorrow Avatar
    JMorrow

    Have a few thoughts on this. I’ll chime in more later, but let me say I agree with Travis that what Jethani describes is less a case of “too much mission” and more a case of narrowing mission. It devalues and delimits the diversity of ways in which Christians can faithfully witness to the mission of God, with what our society often terms as “activism”. That kind of activism sometimes looks similar too, but is not the same as being a missional Christian. Instead, it becomes a parody of mission. It also plays into individualist notions of success, in which life only has meaning by the numbers, specifically my numbers.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading