Myers-Briggs Star Trek Personality Indicator

Continuing with my series of Star Trek 40th anniversary posts, I thought it would be fun to point you to a site that will tell you what Star Trek character you are based on your Myers-Briggs temperament. I am told that some fiction writers use MB to help develop consistency in portraying their characters.

My Myers-Briggs type is Introvert-Intuitive-Thinking-Judging (INTJ). I have taken this test three times over the past twenty years with the same result. All three times, I tested only slightly toward the introvert side, which one counselor said makes me neither an extrovert nor an introvert but an ambivert (which is at least better than being a pervert.) The J has also moved toward the middle, but the N and T are at the edges.

So which Star Trek Character am I? Here is what this website says, with some of my commentary added.

…..

INTJ: MASTERMIND

Originalpicarda You share a basic personality configuration with Jean-Luc Picard and Seven of Nine. [Picard is probably my favorite of the characters.]

People like you are generally autonomous, aloof, and intellectual. You sometimes give the impression you have no need of others, but you're intensely curious and driven to learn. [Me? Intellectual? …Who needs you? I've got study to do.] You're cautious with others socially and respond best to people who don't push you to be friendly or affectionate [Office parties, salespeople who I have never met calling by my first name and all other events requiring mindless chit-chat are surely evidence that hell exists.] You appreciate when others follow your lead and accept your criticism in the helpful spirit in which it is intended. You're calm by nature and feel off-balance when confronted by highly emotional people. [Though asking Melissa several times, I still haven't mastered the difference between "It's so cute!" and "It's so cuuuuuuuute!!!"]

You're highly organized and expect the same of others. You analyze automatically and enjoy seeing patterns and trends. [I wonder what the author meant by this and how it fits with everything else he just said?] When your mind is made up, that's it, which means that while you're definitive and strong, you can be stubborn and arrogant. [Stubborn? Arrogant? I will never, never give in to such a characterization of my superior abilities!]

You respond best to other people's needs when they tell you about them clearly. [Preferably with instructions about how exactly they think I am to address these needs and on what timetable.] You value honesty greatly. You prize people who listen to you and respect your ideals. You are somewhat contemptuous of those who don't pay attention to what you say. [Hmmm…I have never considered myself to be contemptuous of clueless morons.]

You're a conservative dresser, but you have a unique and personal style. [I have a style?]

Your primary goal in life is achieving independence and being able to live according to your own standards. Your reward is continual expansion of your competence and knowledge. [My independent assessment would suggest this is true, but I'll need more research.]

Good careers for your type include being a starship captain, intellectual property attorney, news analyst, design engineer, software developer, inventor, Webmaster, architect, and ex-Borg. [Starship captain? Oh Yeah! "Make is so." Borg…General Assembly Council … pretty close. "I am Mikutus of GAC. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile."]

…..

If I went to the Extrovert side I would be Q. Which Star Trek character are you?

(Seriously, for a more legitimate look at MB types, you can go to Type Logic and look up your own type. The INTJ description is very close to describing me. You can take a short test to determine your MB type by clicking the "Is there a test?" link. In addition to temperament, they also list real and fictional people that share your type, although I question some of their analysis here. For instance, I don't think JFK was an INTJ. However, Hannibal Lecter is spot on. Some liver, fava beans and a nice chianti, anyone?)


Comments

14 responses to “Myers-Briggs Star Trek Personality Indicator”

  1. OK. I went out to the TypeLogic site, and got directed to the Jung typology test at HumenMetrics. I scored ISFJ, and that makes me more like Chakotay.
    The qualitative analysis shows me as moderately expressed introvert, slightly expressed sensing, slightly expressed feeling, and moderately expressed judging.
    The weakest was sensing (1%) and the strongest was judging (56%). The others were 12% for feeling and 33% for introvert.
    The problem with this test was there wasn’t choice labeled “it depends”. If I take the test tomorrow, I might flip from sensing to intuitive and maybe even from feeling to thinking. It depends.
    So, if I’m gong to be Chakotay, do I need to get my face tattooed? (The other option was Beverly Crusher, but I don’t see a clear path to being like her.

  2. Susan Melia-Hancock Avatar
    Susan Melia-Hancock

    Mike,
    I too came in as a ISFJ. I have agree to take the Beverly Crusher role, so Denis doen’t have to go there. It’s a dirty job, but someone has to do it.

  3. Dana Ames Avatar
    Dana Ames

    INFJ-Sisco. Why not? I like him…
    Someone on the NTWrightsaid email list asked what everyone’s profile was. According to that informal survey, every last doggone one of us who answered was an N, with a fairly even distribution of the other three attributes. I believe Wright himself is also an N (forgot the rest of his supposed profile). How ’bout that?
    Dana

  4. Denis, I would have pegged you slightly toward the intuitive side but like you said a lot of it “depends.” Other sorters I have read suggest that you look at the description of the two or three closest to what you are and see which you thing best desribes you.
    Yeah, I am guessing the tatoos might be easier that other alteration to become Crusher.
    Susan I think at the ball game we guessed that you were an ISFJ. So is Melissa. If Denis test is true I am out numbered three to one.

  5. Dana,
    I did a similar thing on the Ooze once and out of more than thirty people, only one was a sensing type (and he was often there as an antagonist.)
    I went to the Emergent Gathering a year ago where there were maybe 200 people in antendance. One evening we all got in cars and vans and went into Santa Fe for dinners. I took two guys along with me in my rental car. The Meyers Briggs stuff came up in conversation. We discovered that all three of us were INTJs yet INTJs are only 1% of the population. By law of averages there should only have been two of us present at the event yet three of us found ourselves in the same car. How many others of us were there?
    This gets at a theory I have held for years about the Emerging Church stuff. I suspect the Emereging stuff draws the intuitive temperaments. Intuitives are only 25% of the population yet they are 90-100% of the people in the venues we are talking about here. It causes me to question if some of the modernist vs. postmodernist stuff is not actually more about sensing vs. frustrated intuitives.

  6. BTW, I forgot to add to this that intuitive feelers are about 12% of the population yet they are nearly 50% of pastors. Inutitive Thinkers are also only about 12% of the population but they make up 40-45% of lawyers.

  7. Michael
    Only 1 percent, huh. I have come through as INTJ twice and INTP once, so I am in that elite group, but my desk is not so tidy.
    Ron

  8. “…my desk is not so tidy.”
    Ah, but I’ll bet your ideas are, at least compared to most other folks. And as you and I know ideas are where the important stuff happens. 🙂
    As I recall INTJ, INTP, INFJ and INFP are each about 1% of the population.

  9. Yeah, I am guessing the tatoos might be easier that other alteration to become Crusher.
    Of course, you DID choose Picard over Seven-0f-Nine….

  10. LOL
    All I have to do now is shave my head.

  11. Dana Ames Avatar
    Dana Ames

    Sounds like there might be a master’s thesis lurking, waiting for someone to pick it up, with your intuition about intuitives.
    Or at least a blog post…
    Dana

  12. “Or at least a blog post…”
    I didn’t know you were clairvoyant? 🙂
    I did some writing about this Sep of 2005 when I was getting going with this blog. I may have to go resurrect, update and edit those posts into a new one.

  13. Dana Ames Avatar
    Dana Ames

    Not clairvoyant…Intuitive 😛
    D.

  14. Bingo!

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading