Controversial new climate change results

University of Bristol: Controversial new climate change results

New data show that the balance between the airborne and the absorbed fraction of carbon dioxide has stayed approximately constant since 1850, despite emissions of carbon dioxide having risen from about 2 billion tons a year in 1850 to 35 billion tons a year now.

The results run contrary to a significant body of recent research which expects that the capacity of terrestrial ecosystems and the oceans to absorb CO2 should start to diminish as CO2 emissions increase, letting greenhouse gas levels skyrocket. Dr Wolfgang Knorr at the University of Bristol found that in fact the trend in the airborne fraction since 1850 has only been 0.7 ± 1.4% per decade, which is essentially zero.

The strength of the new study, published online in Geophysical Research Letters, is that it rests solely on measurements and statistical data, including historical records extracted from Antarctic ice, and does not rely on computations with complex climate models.

This work is extremely important for climate change policy, because emission targets to be negotiated at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen early next month have been based on projections that have a carbon free sink of already factored in. Some researchers have cautioned against this approach, pointing at evidence that suggests the sink has already started to decrease.

So is this good news for climate negotiations in Copenhagen? “Not necessarily”, says Knorr. “Like all studies of this kind, there are uncertainties in the data, so rather than relying on Nature to provide a free service, soaking up our waste carbon, we need to ascertain why the proportion being absorbed has not changed”.

Another result of the study is that emissions from deforestation might have been overestimated by between 18 and 75 per cent. This would agree with results published last week in Nature Geoscience by a team led by Guido van der Werf from VU University Amsterdam. They re-visited deforestation data and concluded that emissions have been overestimated by at least a factor of two.


Comments

4 responses to “Controversial new climate change results”

  1. I am certainly no expert on this matter but it seems to me that there is still not near enough consensus on the cause, effect, cure, or even the reality of this type of climate change to warrant sweeping change. I fear that the world will end up “fixing” a relatively small problem with a very big stick.

  2. I hear ya, Cosmo. Prudence is an important value here. There are good reasons other than climate change for switching to renewable fuels but how quick and at what cost is big question for me.

  3. this research still recognises that the overall amount of CO2 in both atmosphere and non-atmospheric sinks is increasing, it’s just that the proportions of absorbtion aren’t what was expected. In summ, it’s a “things are bad, but not as bad as we though” type conclusion I think.
    My take on it here: http://virtuphill.blogspot.com/2009/11/climate-change-some-of-science.html

  4. Phil, it’s true that the PPM of CO2 is increasing. The only problem is that the temperature isn’t. None of the projected outcomes are occuring. The Great Barrier Reef was suposedly damaged so badly by the effects of CO2 that it would not come back in our lifetime. Less than 10 years later the GBR is back to normal. The Arctic has a bit less ice, but the Antarctic has increase much more than the decrease at the Arctic. The models are so flawed as to be useless. For one thing the models assumed that the Atlantic “conveyor belt” actually existed and relied heavily on it. Unfortunately for the climaters it isn’t true even though it has been taught for decades.
    Destroying economies on maybes seems like a really bad idea. Let the market bring the new technologies forward as they become competitive.

Leave a Reply to Michael W. KruseCancel reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading