Seven things I learned about transition from communism

Vox: Seven things I learned about transition from communism by Harvard Economist Andrei Shlefier

Twenty years ago, communist countries began their shift towards capitalism. What do we know now that we didn’t know then? Harvard's Andrei Shleifer, the Russian-born, American-trained economist, provides his answers and their relevance for contemporary policymakers.

First, in all countries in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, economic activity shrunk at the beginning of transition, in some very sharply. …

Second, the decline was not permanent. … So lesson learned: have faith – capitalism really does work.

Third, the declines in output nowhere led to populist revolts – as many economists had feared. … Instead of populism, politics in many countries came to be dominated by new economic elites, the so-called oligarchs, who combined wealth with substantial political influence. … But the lesson is clear: a reformer should fear not populism but capture of politics by the new elites.

Fourth, economists and reformers overstated both their ability to sequence reforms, and the importance of particular tactical choices, eg, in privatisation. …

Fifth, economists have greatly exaggerated the benefits of incentives by themselves, without changes in people. Economic theory of socialism has put way too much weight on incentives, and way too little on human capital. Winners in the communist system turned out not to be so good in a market economy. Transition to markets is accomplished by new people, not by old people with better incentives. …

Sixth, it is important not to overestimate the long-run consequences of macroeconomic crises and even debt defaults. …

Seventh, it is much easier to forecast economic than political evolution. Although nearly all transition countries have eventually converged to some form of capitalism, there has been a broader range of political experiences, from full democracies, to primitive dictatorships, to just about everything in between. … Lesson learned: middle-income countries eventually slouch toward democracy, but not nearly in as direct or consistent a way as they move toward capitalism.

Fascinating insights. Read the whole thing.

 


Comments

3 responses to “Seven things I learned about transition from communism”

  1. Percival Avatar
    Percival

    That was really interesting. Thanks.
    I find the insights are in line with my realizations of late. I live in an oil-rich Arab country, and it becomes more and more obvious to me that the most difficult part of democratic capitalism has to do with institutions like a free press and an independent judiciary and a culture of civil rights and transparency much more than it has to do with the mechanics of voting, and legislatures, and written laws.

  2. You are welcome.
    There is an economist at the University of Virginia named Peter Rodriguez who says the key element for economic growth in emerging nations has not been democracy, but rather stablity and predictablity. Even in a less free society, if deicsions aren’t made in arbitrary ways and there isn’t constant threat of turmoil, businesses can plan and adapt to a predictable environment.
    If people are despartely poor, they have no property to lose when political fortunes change. “Democracy” ends up being about voting for the tryant who will deliver the most goods. However, as prosperity begans to increase for a wide range of people, citizens have more at stake if arbitrary change occurs. A broad based movment arises to have more transparent government and a legal system that will handle disputes justly. I think that is what the author of this article was observing. The path to a more civil society varies considerably but it does all seem to approach a similar destination eventually.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Kruse Kronicle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading